Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
Hope I'm not wrong but... I saw we can use \*\*BOLD\*\* for **BOLD**, the same as \_\_BOLD\_\_: why not using \_\_ for **underline** instead? I feel the need of having *italic*, **bold**, AND ***underline*** too.
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
I am not disagreeing, but I will point out that it might make things more difficult to tell between a link and an underline.
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
No it shouldn't, links should be a different colour.
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
Markdown knows no kind of underlining , but HTML does and it is *not filtered* ``` Markdown knows no kind of underlining , but HTML does and it is *not filtered* . ``` So, what you do request, actually exists already.
MoreLess
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
I just wrote a Guide of available formatting options, take a look:
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
Thank you ***@nihylum de*** to have pointed me to your impressive guide. It's far more complete than I even need: I promise to @Phicksur I'll use underline only. :-) *(this message apart X-D)* P.S. Isn't it dangerous to have unfiltered ...
MoreLess
Jun 24, 01 / Jun 13, 17 09:29 UTC
No, Elwe Thor. Javascript is properly secured and stripped from HTML5 Tags. Nothing in danger here. Have fun with underlined content.
MoreLess