Hello fellow Asgardians :) I see this community is growing like weeds, and there are a lot of smart, intelligent and good quality people building this community. So as one small piece of this huge community I offer my services free to Asgardia. If you need any web solution or help feel free to contact me and we will work something out.I dont believe in money, I value knowledge more than some paper with random numbers on it. My web site and my web solutions are found here: http://www.evolvo.com.hr Hope I can be of some help :) We can even create asgardia web school I am more than willing to share my knowledge for free ofc and will always help if I can.

We talk about asteroid / comet / moon mining; we talk about space station as long-term life sustainable colony building in the orbit of the Earth. We talk about shied building for protecting the Earth from space threat. etc. Question is: What if we calculate wrong and by our action path is changed. So we actually cause to hit Earth rather than prevent that. What will be our safety protocol? Will we have opportunity to lunch our colony in deep space and by that protect all at Earth or we will find how to hit with lower damage? Etc --------------------------------- ... ... I would rather see us in deep space then that we do harm to our home planet and by our mistake do wrong to all life that exist on the Earth. But at moment I ask this to see what protocols exist already in these situations, if any exist at all. What we did consider before (on FB, here on forum in other topics). Can we make short conclusion to see what laws should be written etc.

Hi :) I was thinking, if you all agree, that we have one official post where will be the list of nick (not personal data name, but nick we did choose to present us) that are CERTIFIED Asgardias. How new came you can add them there ... no need that we respond on that post. Why I ask for this? I can see that from mine country is over 400 members that are certified, but I did not get feedback information am within that number or not. So if you could provide us official list so we do not spam inbox till we wait that certificates came to us as respond. I am worried am on that list or not, and if we do not have that information here I will need send mail and ask it officially (I think that would not be good thing if we all start to do this). Thank you :) :)

This forum is not same as other forums over world. If someone is banned then this is equal as censorship. If someone is banned it is same as it stop exist as (future) citizen of Asgardia. This Forum is our street, our only official public place where only (future) citizens can write and noone else. Do policemen arrest you since you do not speak polite way and judge you at same moment? Does policemen take you freedom to speak forever after once you did do wrong way? I think we need talk more about this topic and find solutions that will work now, and on future public online places we will have. ----------------------------------------------- 1. We need New Topic marked with blue line free of any restrictions. Every banned member (if exist, and should not exist) should be able to present problem there. Public need to be informed why we lost one member opinion to hear. 2. Every deleted post / topic as well every edited post / topic should be seen at original version on profile of author of that post (with information what is edited / deleted).

Could you please provide official information: When is deadline for submitting proposal of the Constitution? Thank you :) :) --------------------------- Additional note: I am member of group that is self-orginized in constitution writing (all are welcome to join) and at moment am worried will we finish on time since we do not have any information about procedure for submission of proposals for Constitution. For example: Can one author give proposal, or this should be team work? How to propose and where will be submitted for revision by Asgardians? Do we have team of experts formed for revision (economy, law, health)? Who did choose members of that team? What are requirements one member need have? Is there present mandatory body that will run revision? If there is where we can see that body? etc ...

Topic is open just for creation of definition that will be universal for all draft versions of constitution. 1. “citizen” 2. “non-citizen” 3. "sapient" Explanation: Constitutions protect right of every human no matter is citizen or visitor and by that exclude any other group of beings to have rights equal to human. Draft versions of constitution (available in several FB groups) show intention that as space nation we should done this differently. This is still open topic should be that way, for moment let we assume we did agree with this. Proposition that is available is word “sapient”. Many disagree with that for different reasons. Many agree that is right way to do. There is no better proposal for now, so in draft version is “sapient”. ------------------------------- Personal opinion: I disagree with “sapient” since show elements of discrimination. Because of this, in mine opinion, word "sapient" will not be accepted by international law community. Arguments: 1. Sapient exclude “only-sentient being” also all other type of beings we could encounter and we cannot define at moment since we cannot imagine them. 2. Possible problem is within questions “Is present discrimination of human in coma?” ------------------------------------------ Propositions: 1. We define “citizen” and “non-citizen” without using words as follows: human, sapient, sentient, AI etc and by that we leave to other legislative acts to do that in moment when is needed. 2. Definition should exclude possibility that I ask in the name of dolphin, tuna and/or chicken to have equal rights as citizen or human visitor. 3. Definition of “citizen” should include beings that belong to group of beings capable to show intention that by it choice are willing to have approved citizenship of Asgardia. Term “ask” is connected to sapience and should be avoid, so how to define this part? 4. Definition of “citizen” should include young one of parents that have citizenship of Asgardia. AI cannot have parents, so how to define this? 5. Definition of “non-citizen” should include human visitor and every other being that belong to group of beings that are capable that by their personal choice be under jurisdiction of Asgardia and have some type of interaction with us according to our laws. 6. If quote “belong to group of beings capable of” is changed with quote “belong to species capable of” then we need provide definition for “species” too as term that include species defined within biology, with addition of AI and life forms not know today no matter will be sapient, sentient, neither or combination of both. 7. Also we need left space that individual will be unique and by that will not belong to any group but will be capable that by it choice, by it will (choice and will should be defined too then) show intention to be either citizen of Asgardia or visitor under jurisdiction of Asgardia with protected rights equal to humans according to same law valid for humans. 8. Definition should exclude use of “understanding law” since word “understanding” is linked directly to sapience. Example, sentient being could feel energy changed when it follow common behavior and energies when it broke the law and by that it could perceive how to beehive to be acceptable.

Proposition that we have topic / subforum open just for queastions related to Constitution matter. This will help about terms choosen to define things but also all other topics related to government etc. Thank you :)