Any incorporated business of the United States requires there be a REGISTERED AGENT for legal process of service to a corporation. Corporations consist of everything from schedule C corporations (big, multinational) to Schedule S (small corporation) and LLC (limited liability companies, as small as one owner/operator). The REGISTERED AGENT ...
Any incorporated business of the United States requires there be a REGISTERED AGENT for legal process of service to a corporation. Corporations consist of everything from schedule C corporations (big, multinational) to Schedule S (small corporation) and LLC (limited liability companies, as small as one owner/operator). The REGISTERED AGENT is the only designated legal contact for the State on matters of service, prohibiting harassment or improper contact with officers and members of the Board of Directors for a corporation or company.
All corporations are UNITED STATES CORPORATIONS in the territory, while Limited Liability Companies are State entities granted certain recognition as corporations at the Federal Level (United States) with much less regulatory requirements.
Any effort to confuse the REGISTERED AGENT with an EMPLOYEE of the U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, LEGISLATIVE OR JUDICIARY OR EXECUTIVE BRANCH, is outright fraud. By Law, REGISTERED AGENTS are not EMPLOYEES, and are free to engage in legal communication with the State or Federal Senate, House, and all other offices on behalf of a corporation or company or any legal matter in concern to the people of the State or American People. Every business operating in the United States which uses the prior business structures have a REGISTERED AGENT, whose name is entered on the roll of the State as record, and to exclude them from any rights afforded a member of the American People (The People) is a federal felony in the United States (18 USC 242).
Do not be misled by foreign instigators, or persons seeking to alienate Asgardia in the business community and discredit the community through hostility toward American based businesses and the United States. This is an effort to disenfranchise Asgardia from recognition as a nation and to damage the credibility of Asgardia supporting money laundering and human trafficking activity which require cryptocurrency issues to remain illegal, unregulated, and a viable source of external trade for contraband and criminal activity violating the inalienable rights of victims in conflict zones.
U.S. legislation to this effect to regulate (not ban) large cryptocurrency transactions citing financing of hostilities and money laundering in time of war are presently under draft, and business owners observing the character and attitudes of the community against transparency and free speech to criticize and improve the regular actions leading to lawful recognition and acceptance of Asgardia in diplomatic office. The recommendation and testimony to the credibility and responsible activity of the community will be a factor in the determination of the privatization (corporate governance) or nationalist initiatives (people's governance) of space and aerospace security. Those of us that believe in human rights over corporate privilege (civil and statutory rights, which may be suspended) are fighting for all of Asgardia and all people. We need your support to make this case before the United States and its member States, and to show that Asgardia is not a clear and present danger to the stability and security of the world.
Prohibitions on commercial activity and new regulations increasingly resembling the United Soviet Socialist Republic, to include suppression of negative and critical content in official channels of dialog, do not support this matter. Questions are to be examined, not expelled, and where securities (cryptocurrency, stock, bonds, or options in future goods and services) are tendered, such activity may violate the global laws on trade and commerce in "prospectus" shopping these elements while actively eliminating criticism and report of risks, flaws, defects, concerns, or shareholder access to meetings (disenfranchisement). I have over 25 years of corporate governance (1991-present) experience, and wish to help.
"Suppression of the question does not support Asgardia."
- James Arnold Allen