Dec 2, 17 / Cap 00, 01 21:33 UTC
Re: Secularity and Scientocracy ¶
It may honestly end up being more of a Technocracy which is driven, of course, by science.
I like what you are thinking.
Dec 2, 17 / Cap 00, 01 21:33 UTC
It may honestly end up being more of a Technocracy which is driven, of course, by science.
I like what you are thinking.
Dec 3, 17 / Cap 01, 01 02:04 UTC
In another thread I recommend what I am calling a Social Technocracy.
https://asgardia.space/en/forum/forum/constitution-132/topic/asgardia-cannot-be-a-constitutional-monarchy-5569/?page=5
Reposted here:
*****
Perhaps we should work towards a Social (values driven) Technocracy (science and technology) government where science and technology is driven to support the people, guided and moderated by such philosophical ideas such as:
* Interdependence
* Sustainability
* Justice and Compassion
* Equity
* Education
We will have the Technocractic balanced and guided by the Social Philosophical aspects who goals would be set by the government.
* Council of Asgardian Values (organization representing the values and philosoph)
* Council of Science and Technology (organization representing the collective science and technology professionals and ideals)
* Government (sets goals)
****
For me, what you are suggesting - using science to achieve positive behavioural outcomes would fall under a Technocracy, at least I am using it.
Social Technocracy: using science and technology as a primary driving force to achieve as sustainable and equitable society.
Science applied to all facets of Human civilization: energy, architecture, waste management, and behaviour too.
Using science to help make sure people are happy is a good thing, although, of course, under the wrong hands this could go horribly awry, which is partially why my thoughts on a social democracy provides a balance between, goal setting, philosophy. and methodology.
How does that sound?
Dec 3, 17 / Cap 01, 01 05:39 UTC
Yea, that is what I am meaning.
Yea, I have a significant commentary on the Constitution.
I have not looked at specifically how to rewrite the constitution to fit this model.
However, your idea of seeing how it fits according to the existing model sounds like a great start.
I really appreciate your thoughts and ideas. You definitely sound like you have spent some time studying this stuff.