Nov 20, 17 / Sag 16, 01 05:20 UTC

Moot point. It is illegal.  

This is a moot point. Asgardia cannot be a Nation in Space, and militarization of space is banned anyway.

http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/outerspacetreaty.html

Article II

Outer  space, including the moon and  other celestial bodies, is not subject  to national appropriation by  claim of sovereignty, by means of use or  occupation, or by any other  means.

Article IV

States  Parties to the Treaty undertake  not to place in orbit around the earth  any objects carrying nuclear  weapons or any other kinds of weapons of  mass destruction, install such  weapons on celestial bodies, or station  such weapons in outer space in  any other manner.

The  moon and other celestial bodies  shall be used by all States Parties to  the Treaty exclusively for  peaceful purposes. The establishment of  military bases, installations  and fortifications, the testing of any  type of weapons and the conduct  of military manoeuvres on celestial  bodies shall be forbidden. The use  of military personnel for scientific  research or for any other peaceful  purposes shall not be prohibited.  The use of any equipment or facility  necessary for peaceful exploration  of the moon and other celestial  bodies shall also not be prohibited.

Nov 20, 17 / Sag 16, 01 14:45 UTC

"Hi @Patrick McManus,

You've  posted the exact same comment in the thread 'No need for military' . As  we are a large community, we do not need unnecessary clutter. We ask  that you post your message only once in a given area. Moderation staff  may move material to a more appropriate board without notice."

What? That's idiotic. Please do not simply move posts, especially when both posts were perfectly appropriate exactly where they were. Please ADDRESS them instead. Thank you!!!

Nov 20, 17 / Sag 16, 01 20:23 UTC

Did you just call me stupid?

Nov 20, 17 / Sag 16, 01 20:24 UTC

And still you can't respond to the content of the thread or report up your chain of command that there is an important question to be answered? Why not?

Nov 20, 17 / Sag 16, 01 20:40 UTC

No name calling? You disappoint. On so many levels. ;-)