Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 07:31 UTC

asgardia and keshe Science and technology.(与凯史太空机构接壤)  

由于我英文比较差 如果有英语好的同学 可以帮我翻译一下!

作为一个在太空建国的国家 asgardia 还没有一块合法的国土!

现在的太空机构 普遍使用燃料飞船 进行太空作业!耗时耗力!

我希望asgardia可以使用更方便的凯史科技 使用磁引力飞船

这样可以加速 在太空建国的速度 包括医疗与能源完美的解决!

凯史基金会官网 keshe http://www.keshefoundation.org 中文官网http://www.keshefoundation.cn/

凯史科技介绍视频(中英)http://v.youku.com/vshow/idXMTg2Nzg4NDgyOA==.html?from=s1.8-1-1.2&spm=a2h0k.8191407.0.0

asgardia 进度与翻译小组招新 Q群205307500


"Because my English is poor if there are good students can help me translate!

Asgardia as a country in space, the country has not a legitimate land!

Space agencies are now widely used fuel spacecraft for space operations! Time-consuming labor!

I hope that Asgardia can use the more convenient Keith Technology to use magnetic gravity spaceships

This can speed up the speed of the founding of space, including medical and energy perfect solution!

Kai Shi Foundation official website keshe http://www.keshefoundation.org Chinese official website http://www.keshefoundation.cn/

Kay Technology Introduction Video (Chinese and English) http://v.youku.com/vshow/idXMTg2Nzg4NDgyOA==.html?from=s1.8-1-1.2&spm=a2h0k.8191407.0.0

Asgardia progress and translation team recruit new Q group 205307500"

Admin Edit: The above translation is provided by Google Translator. I'm also moving this topic to the Ministry of Science: Physical Sciences boards. Please, keep in mind that English is the language that should be used across this forum. If you can't express yourself in English, consider posting in the dedicated Chinese Board.

  Last edited by:  Alessandro Fiume (Asgardian)  on Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 07:45 UTC, Total number of edits: 2 times

Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 07:39 UTC

凯史太空机构视频地址http://v.youku.com/vshow/idXMTg2Nzg4NDgyOA==.html?from=s1.8-1-1.2&spm=a2h0k.8191407.0.0#paction

Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 08:02 UTC

感谢上面同学的翻译!很抱歉 中文是我的母语!我在发帖时面对论坛与官网上的字母很困惑! 如你所见 我区分不了这些板块!当初在注册asgardia官网时 为了 避开中国的长城防火墙 我翻墙注册成为了asgardia的一份子!我认为语言不应该成为一道墙 隔阂彼此! 至少在asgardia的建设中 我们应该更团结!论坛的中文板块或系统应该快些建成!

Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 13:34 UTC

看了他们的网站,这个凯史基金会明显是在宣扬伪科学。

Cap 20, 00 / Dec 21, 16 23:09 UTC

I had hoped that this forum would be a place to discuss engineering with individuals who are familiar with the constraints of aerospace projects.

The linked page, http://www.keshefoundation.org, has little bearing on reality - it speaks of the neutron as being composed (partially!) of antimatter. This is absurd.

Whoever is curating this forum, can we boost the SNR please?

Cap 22, 00 / Dec 23, 16 04:17 UTC

我再次回复一下楼上的几条!首先我想对管理员说几句! 语言不应该成为我与大家沟通的障碍!你一直在强调用英语 还有翻译器! 这一点我很生气!作为有13万中国区的用中文的同学 在论坛开启的第一天就被警告用英文! 我觉得受到了排斥!你们管理员可不可以拿出 管理员 应有的态度?积极面对! 还有keshe科技是现今非常非常先进的科技!请不要困在自己 的知识盒子里! 当然keshe先生出版的《宇宙起源》《光的结构》这两本书不是主流的认知! asgardia 不应该再使用陈旧的课本!希望大家保持理性的看待keshe科技!

Aqu 04, 01 / Jan 4, 17 17:11 UTC

Boosting the SNR is unfortunately only possible by increasing the signal. Filtering noise isn't entirely practical - and even urealistic concepts could give rise to viable ones.

From an engineering point of view, is there any particular reason the energy generation methods and othersuch proposed on that site should fail? Lacking any particular obvious and unreconcilable failure points, it strikes me as at least viable to build units for testing.

Aqu 12, 01 / Jan 12, 17 06:42 UTC

If Keshe actually had something then it would be proper for full disclosure and peer review. None of which has happened.

When gasoline prices were nearing $4/gallon here in the US many people were experimenting with HHO gas, e.g. water (H2O) broken down by electrolysis. Welders are made that generate and burn HHO, and this gas has been injected into normal 4 stroke internal combustion engines, typically increasing their efficiencies by 20% or more, but the engines that offered the highest efficiency gains were old school carburetor type engines. Alas nothing came of it all. Even tho this concept has been around since the '60's

All a bunch of pseudo science

Increasing the SNR only requires a gamma beam lol

  Last edited by:  Michael Honn (Asgardian)  on Aqu 12, 01 / Jan 12, 17 06:44 UTC, Total number of edits: 1 time

Aqu 13, 01 / Jan 13, 17 16:30 UTC

A gamma beam in this instance would only create more issues. Being unable to adjust the noise, logically adjusting the signal is to be the more sensible option.

The problem with burning gas like that is it's primitive, caveman primitive. It's not surprising much failed to occur via. Also, splitting the hydrogen via electrolysis would of offset any "efficiency gains" of the process.

Nowadays hydrogen generators can be quite compact and not all utilise combustion. Some of these can recycle 99.9999% and thusly run for months on a litre, and we can split the hydrogen off chemically, too, potentially with on-demand capacity meaning there's little requirement to store hydrogen, as hydrogen.

Other things that may fit your "psudoscience" definition would be the likes of Shawyer's EM-Drive and Rossi's E-Cat reactor. Although possibly not good examples as both of these systems have papers out for peer review, but they're commonly viewed as "pseudoscience" purely because folks are generally unable to sufficiently explain the mechanism on which they operate. This doesn't mean they don't operate, however.

IMHO the only way to truely confirm/discount something is to actually build a model and test it... Granted, I'm not instantly able to ascertain the operating mechanism of http://www.keshefoundation.org/documenten/finish/14-blueprints/30-hybrid-magrav-blueprint/0 for example, but that's not to say it doesn't operate. Although not the clearest diagram I've ever read, it's obvious they seem to think this can power two residential fridge compressors(does this get hot?) constantly, and has capacity for other devices. There's only so much it's possible to learn from such a diagram, with the next logical step to build and test. http://keshefoundation.org/ReactorDesign/index.html I think I understand a little better, but am still slightly shoeless. I postulate it operates via some interactions of rotating and counter-rotating magnetic fields providing for linear acutation - or linear acutation providing for rotation. Maybe even both. The only way to truely find out is to build, test - experiment.

  Updated  on Aqu 13, 01 / Jan 13, 17 16:31 UTC, Total number of edits: 1 time
Reason: typo

Aqu 19, 01 / Jan 19, 17 14:45 UTC

keshe 技术没见成果

Pis 13, 01 / Feb 10, 17 16:57 UTC

Kesh Science is a pseudo science institution, its theory does not conform to the reality of the laws of physics, experiment is the sole criterion for testing truth, but 2012 claiming to invent a perpetual motion machine Kesh has not come up with a usable prototype, such examples do not that be too numerous to enumerate, this is a scam? (this is the use of Baidu translation the translation, may be inaccurate, roughly meaning that can be understand the landlord)

Leo 09, 01 / Jun 26, 17 10:11 UTC

  1. About the Keshe science and technology. As for me it is not a real technology and it's a pseudo science. It talks about antigravity and the perpetual motion that is proven by the quantum physic and string theory in the QQ group. But that is non sense and they didn't provide scientific explanation about this. 
  2. Also in the Taobao which is a website that can sell and buy stuff. They just sell something about the magic water that can make you immortal. It not only meanless but also not scientific proven.