Thank you for voting!

It depends on how big the stones are. Consider that the energy developed by the single stone is calculated with this formula (E = 1/2 m .V. V) where E is the energy, m is the mass of the stone and V . V is the square of the speed at which the stone moves. Greeting

Very interesting, I remember learning about how entangled particles have a spin and they already know which one they will be and only we can see it will we know. Bring up a lot of questions. Does consciousness have an effort on such a small scale? It would help explain a bit of why things change when we observe them. Why do the entangled particles have the properties they have? Really maybe it's not up for us to say why but going on the craziest theories ive ever heard. Could the starngeness of our physics be proof of our reality being a simulation??? Well simulations would be so good at contorling its parts it could have the potential of sending data points (the spin of the entangled particles) across vast distances. Well just a rant went a off askew but just a little food for thought. Thank you for your time have a blessed rest of your day.

You are right, asteroids with a predominantly metallic composition are dangerous; in the crossing of the atmosphere they lose little mass and therefore maintain a high energy value that in the impact becomes destruction. However, we must not underestimate the rocky ones, the larger ones, are equally dangerous because if they do not consume or shatter in the crossing of the atmosphere they have enough energy to create even devastating damage. An example of the power that gives off ferrous asteroids/ meteorites can be observed near Flagstaff: the meteor Crater produced by a meteorite of about 50 meters in diameter ( 1.2 kilometers of diameter and 170 meters in depth). Tomorrow, having developed an adequate technology, they can be a source of raw materials, but given the costs of exploitation, will they be Resources actually accessible to everyone?

I agree . Coronal mass emissions (solar plasma) are dangerous for our satellites ( telecommunications, observation both towards the Earth and towards the universe): in areas where the hole in the ozonosphere caused by the missions of human activities coincides with inhabited areas, losses of electronic equipment and heavy disturbances in telecommunications will be possible. What generates the aforementioned emissions is a mechanism of The Sun on which the appropriate studies are being carried out. As I said in another post, the rise in sea levels is due to the effects of greenhouse gases and the deposit of soot produced by the combustion of fossil energies that feed our society. Our planet has become a duller body and therefore absorbs greater amounts of heat. The expected sea level, once the Greenland and polar ice sheets melt will reach 6 meters above the current level. Imagine a storm with mare forza 7 (Big Sea) with waves between 6 and 9 meters high; this value should be added to the quiet sea level . We are talking about heights compared to today's that arrrivo at altitudes of 12/ 15 m . Imagine resorts like Florida, Seichelles Islands and all the atolls that make up the pressing multitude in the Pacific Ocean. Imagine the difficulties of navigation between the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean; currently the Mediterranean is at - 20 cm relative to the Atlantic Ocean. What would happen with a rise of 6 meters?. By 2100, scientists predicted the likely loss of 6,000 square kilometers of coastline in Italy alone. Finally, if a coronal mass emission starts, it travels at a speed that our spaceships look like turtles in comparison. We need to rebalance and improve the screens of our Spaceship Earth, we have no other choice for this century.