Thank you for voting!

Radiation Hardened hardware for space. Anybody who has a favorite for a rad-hard-computer? I have been coming from C=64 to Amiga 68k to Amiga PPC. Later this went to apple and linux PPC. The ideal would be a linux-based system so that common people could have access to programming these hardware's. But i guess starting with intel or amd and a cross-compiler would do the trick. Anybody that have some info, advice and/or experience with theses systems? As a main info link on wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hardening#Examples_of_rad-hard_computers Grtz, Dirk.

Today i want to talk about a view how to use space as an energy source. Lets begin with the fundamental energy sources, these are hot and cold, and electrons and atoms. If we go from hot to cold we make fuel and if we are going from cold to hot we make energy. Alongside these processes we have friction and decay. These could be at a certain level be described in the same way, making fuel and making energy. Lets aim our view at the earth and the sun. The disk's are the input of material/energy and the jets are the output of electrons/fuel. What we first need is a hot core. A hot core is an energy source which creates current in the form of decaying material and pushing electrons. This current goes from core to jet to current to mass. So the magnetic field is in fact a current of electrons going out from the jets (poles) to where ever it finds mass in space. The other way around is material that is attracted by the core and by humans specified as gravity which is in fact intake of bound mass and electrons. Ok, so now we have a flowing current of electrons in space. As we humans are mostly busy with the disk-level of the solar-system we have almost no knowledge of the jet-level of our solar-system and its electron-currents. We do have this knowledge from the earth which is in fact applicable to all hot mass-cores in space. There the sun is more massive we can assume that these forces are comparable more energetic, and also more hot as we know already. :-) Ok, my idea would be to use these streams of electron-current from the sun's jets as driving force for an electron-engine while using the expanding forces of cold and hot, as example from gas to vacuum, or water to steam, or ice to water, etc.. If there exists flows/currents to the back of the heliosphere we could travel in cyclic ways from the sun to the back and re-tour. This would also set the beginning of universal solar sailing from mass to mass. Grtz, Dirk.

The digital version of ROOM 22 is online. https://room.eu.com/ Grtz, Dirk.

A new thought about the expansion of the universe. As i previous described the expansion of the universe as the biggest force, then lets now rethink how that force was build up over time. The logic way would be that after a big explosion all things cool down and the slowing down would begin to start. The problem that i saw from in the beginning is that the universe is accelerating instead of slowing down and that seems not logic to me. If i follow my own way of thought then i can perfectly explain why the universe is expanding in a more logical way. So lets say that there was no big bang but there where gradually more and more supper-nova's from dying stars. In this process heavy matter was gradually being created by the implosions and the following up explosions drove more and more electrons into the universe. This would then bring us to a gradually expanding and accelerating universe. As expansion relates to cooling down we can now say that the space in the universe is cooling down. The following question could be is the universe able to make new gasses to make it a recycling process. The products that we have are jets, electrons and dust. Are these products enough to make new gas? Does carbon play anywhere an important role? So as it is said often, the more we know the more questions arise. But in a way i think we should combine overall thinking with the precision of science to get to the answers. Not by releasing continuously proven papers every other day to destroy all other options but more in an open mind to gradually build up our knowledge till it makes sense with the past, present and the future. Grtz, Dirk.

Lets use some space logic's to search for anti-gravity and gravity. The biggest force in space is the expanding of the universe. The next consequence of this force are the jets who eject electrons. The consequence of the ejecting electrons are the concentration of matter. The next consequence is that external electrons are attracted true the matter-disk and therefore create gravity to all electrons that are bound to atoms. The free electrons are not bound to gravity. Ok, at this stage we have found gravity. Now lets try to inverse the forces to find anti-gravity. The logic way would be to inverse the expanding universe force, but this force is so big and widespread that we as little humans are just some dust-particles to it. The next step would be to inverse the electron-jets. This could be achieved by electric magnets which could push matter (aka bound electrons to atoms) away from the center of the earth. As an example the magnets should push the internal magnets + vehicle up from the surface of the earth. This is of course best to achieve in space itself as gravity is much lower there. I recall to have seen already some of these vehicles in space, so it must be a present mastered technique. If we would expand this technique with an electron vortex which could be directed towards a place in space like for example the core of the moon i think we would have a good travel device. Ok, next we are going to search for gravity in space. As we have seen the predecessor for gravity is an electron-jet away from a central point at 90 degrees from the matter-disk. Then it should be possible to take a fast spinning magnetic double cone that could direct an electron stream towards the center of the space-vehicle away true the 2 points of the double cone. In this way we should be able to get gravity on the electron-atom bound particles inside the vehicle. This could be aggravated by space-costumes with materials with lots of electrons around their atoms to enforce electron attraction. Ok, this comes alive out of my brain so it is now up to the scientists to think about it, make some calculations and do some tests. ;-) Grtz, Dirk.

Is there something Asgardia can learn from patreon? https://www.patreon.com/ Grtz, Dirk.

I think a good way to promote open software in Asgardia would be Stellarium on Linux. I have here 30+ pc's with debian and i thought that i should do something useful with it as long as they are not used here for the moment. Maybe a new linux distro install from time to time with the view of stellarium could be useful. Grtz, Dirk.

Hello just going to type some stuff as my brain outputs it. Lets say that hot mass produces light. This goes from red hot radiation to hot light. Hot light is something that has a certain distance to it, till it fades away, depending how hot the source is and how strong the radiation-waves is. Cold light comes from electrons or electricity. This light comes from high energy splittings. We could see this as an electron with a very high frequency and the universe is full of it, till it hits an absorber/object and becomes part of the negative electron environment. So the universe has it hot sources that emit hot radiation and light like stars and galaxy's, but the most light is hidden in dark high frequency electrons that exist for ever till they hit an object and reflects the flash. As more and more mass is melting together the more free electrons are pushing the universe aside. We can see this behavior with the white/black board test in a vacuum. The negative cold electrons can also bind together when extreme cold and gravity/spin forces are used like for example black holes and for-runners of these. We also have to consider the cold waves in the universe as the sonic/sound waves which also contain energy. All these forces have their own dimensions and that is why we do not always feel and see the consequences on a human level but could very well be very catastrophic on hot and cold cores in the universe. Grtz, Dirk.