Recently, US president Donald Trump have imposes a 90-day ban on travellers from 7 Muslim-majority countries. Although the ban is clumsy and poorly thought out (I guess most people would agree). The reason behind it "protect the United States from foreign nationals entering from countries compromised by terrorism and a ...
Recently, US president Donald Trump have imposes a 90-day ban on travellers from 7 Muslim-majority countries. Although the ban is clumsy and poorly thought out (I guess most people would agree). The reason behind it "protect the United States from foreign nationals entering from countries compromised by terrorism and a more rigorous vetting process." is understandable.
Now let's assume we will face sort of the same situation after Asgardia have been establish, for example: There's a country A, which have been identified there's a terrorist group who vow to destroy any one who touches 'God'(This is just an assumption, don't need to be serious on it). And our national security found they might cause a threat to our Country, but there's too much travellers or people apply visa, which we may not carefully vet them and keep the one who cause a threat out. One logical way to solve this is to temporary stop immigrant or refugees by a travel ban. The question is, how should we issue a travel ban(or other policy you guys could think of) that would not cause huge protests (e.g. What currently happens in the US right now) and also can meet our cause efficiently?
I meant to state that the same condition is being applied, it is compulsory for me to agree with these things, I have no rights on the issue. Should I wish to gain the rights of a citizen later I must arbitrarily comply with conditions or remain a second ...
I meant to state that the same condition is being applied, it is compulsory for me to agree with these things, I have no rights on the issue. Should I wish to gain the rights of a citizen later I must arbitrarily comply with conditions or remain a second class citizen (or expatriate resident).
Hi @ petrv ,
Personally speaking as a British Citizen I used my rights to move to the USA. As a resident in the USA I was given the choice to accept the US legal system for my period of residency or not ...
Hi @ petrv ,
Personally speaking as a British Citizen I used my rights to move to the USA. As a resident in the USA I was given the choice to accept the US legal system for my period of residency or not accept and not be able to reside in the country. Should I use my right to obtain Naturalization I will again be given the option to accept the Constitution or not and this will affect how my obtaining citizenship terminates.
Would this not be the same qualification as what we are being asked to do in Asgardia right now?
Unless you live in a country where voting is compulsory... then you are stuck with a duty to vote for an idiot that is the lesser of all the idiots listed on the ballot paper.