I will accept the proposed constitution, but I will however state here a few things which I think are not correct and may be the cause of trouble in the future.

1: On article 17 it is stated that the government will encourage the spread of moral ideas, and on article 22 it is stated that immoral propaganda and other things which may be harmful to morality shall be prohibited. I believe these are dangerous statements since the precise morality that is being referenced is not defined, and many very different ideas, often even contradictory, exist on earth. Furthermore, since the Supreme Values are precisely defined and constitute a certain morality, addressing them is enough, and mentioning a certain morality besides them is not only, in the best scenario, redundant, but may lead to confusion and greater trouble.

2: I do not understand the arguments to limit the age of Parliament and Court members to be above 40, and I do not agree with such limit.

3: I believe that citizens need must have the right to propose amendments to the constitution, which must always be referended anyway, as it is stated.