I've been interested in the concept of micronations. This, along with the basic concept of Asgardia focusing on space, is the source of my interest in the project. Like virtually all micronations, Asgardia seems large on rhetoric and ideas, and short on reality. That isn't, by itself, a bad thing ...
I've been interested in the concept of micronations. This, along with the basic concept of Asgardia focusing on space, is the source of my interest in the project.
Like virtually all micronations, Asgardia seems large on rhetoric and ideas, and short on reality. That isn't, by itself, a bad thing since ideas are the basis of what can become reality. Perhaps one of the best legacies of Asgardia might be to bring the idea of common space colonization to greater discussion.
Is Asgardia a nation? No. Asgardia is, at best, a Austrain corporation. Will Asgardia become a nation? No, that probably won't happen either. At least not in any sense that will be recognized by common citizens.
There are a few reasons why Asgardia will find it difficult to attain nationhood in any realistic sense. First, of course, there is no more land for Asgardia to hold. Holding land has been a foundation of nationhood since the concept began. Gaining and holding "land" has been the dream and failing of every micronation that has come into existence. Some have even gotten to a point of taking control of oil rigs in international waters to get "land." This has nearly always ended in a military takeover once the micronation has gained too much attention.
The only exception to this has been the Principality of Sealand, an abandonned oil rig off the SE coast of Britain. It based its national claim on being in international waters, which a British court recognized. Then Britain took over the area (extended its claim around itself), taking Sealand into British territory. No one recognizes Sealand. Its citizens and government comprises one or two people, neither of which live on the oil rig. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea specifically ruled that artificial structures don't have the status of land in international law. There was a 1990 US court case whereby ships were banned from registering in Sealand as a flag of convenience. This has been the most successful nation to date.
Having said all of that, and using Sealand as a jumping off point, minus the land, Asgardia is actually doing very well. We have a MUCH more robust government and infrastructure. But that could be a problem as well. Nations traditionally don't like competition, and they see themselves increasingly as a closed club.
Traditionally you get into the club by successfully splitting off from a current member of the club and then being recognized as successfully having done so by other members of the club. South Sudan is a good, recent example here. But South Sudan is both an example we wouldn't want to follow, nor can we.
In the end, I think, the only way into the nation club is to get other members to recognize you as being in the club. To get there, we need to be able to offer something to other nations to be able to form - frankly - alliances. What do we have that other countries might find valuable? Why would they want us to be a nation?
Here the only thing I can think of is our people and our ideas. Our people seem to range from people with some validity (sometimes so much so that I wonder why they're part of this wild idea!), to - frankly - crackpots that offer simple circuits to generate "free energy" and "polymaths" that tout their ability to predict the future.
Perhaps some thought might be given to if we really want to be a nation at all. Are nations has-been institutions? Is the real power corporate now?
It might seem that, reading through all of this, that I'm anti-Asgardia. I'm not. The idea is interesting, certainly, and it can be argued that even now Asgardia is the most successful micronation in history given its activity and infrastructure. Usually micronations are one or two people - Asgardia is definitely not. It does seem to have some sort of momentum behind it, and in the end, that might be what is most important. However, to the people who I see express impatience as to how long things are taking (passports, citizenship, etc), you may need to realize that if Asgardia succeeds in these things at all, many of us may not live to see it.
But we may all be seen, someday, as visionary founders. Maybe.