Another reason for marriage failing (and by marriage, I mean any union of human beings) is that we choose our companion on ephemeral characteristics. Like weight, athleticism,  muscle definition. Instead, we should make our choice based on more permanent ones, like character, attitude, mentality. Generally virtues that time cannot erode.

....slightly pessimistic, slightly offensive, metaphorical and probably true. You were warned.

Let us think of life as a watery hole filled with excrement (shit). The only thing that we can see floating are turds. In fact, the biggest ones seem to dominate. How did they get so big as to dominate the smaller ones? The asshole that expelled them had eaten way, way more than the rest.

It is hard to find a worse kind of insult than someone forced to dig his own grave or transport the "tools" of his execution and I think that is precisely what happens right now in the global economy.

Take for example the debt crisis in Greece. Instead of support and humane treatment, there is an abhorrent propaganda and insults. Granted someone more powerful can do these things and more, but should he really? Shouldn't the primary job of someone powerful be to protect those weaker than him? When did we become so jaded that we cannot see the numbers get translated in real persons with feelings, lives, hopes, and dreams?

In what sense is Europe a "family"? Do you treat a brother owning you money as a homeless stranger that his very presence offends you? Clearly, your global power assigns you a position on the chess board and we are simply pawns in this ordeal. How can there be camaraderie then, if you consider human beings inferior simply because of the country they originate?

The weak must serve the strong in order to survive. 2015. Humanity.Suits and ties and wealth.

Moving on. What is crime? "An action or omission which constitutes an offense and is punishable by the law". That phrase is indicative of the purpose behind its use. What is that purpose, I wonder. Is it justice? Action, omission, offense, punishment, law. Sounds more controlling, forcing, expecting obedience rather than serving justice, equality, life, does it not?

Two points.We are supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law. The person at the top of any hierarchical structure is responsible for the whole pyramid underneath him.

Let's talk about numbers and repercussions. As a result of the pressure by the German Chancellor, more than three thousand men and women committed suicide in Greece in the current timeline of events. In peacetime that would be quite an achievement for any serial killer. Let's forget temporarily the outrage of comparing a Chancellor with a serial killer. The aforementioned "accusation" indeed has several logic flaws. However, and please hear me out, if you know that taking certain "measures" in a certain "way" will lead to deaths aren't you at least *partially* responsible for the outcome (bearing in mind the two points above)?

We could blame the victims of course. They were weak (see above). They were sick. They chose poorly. They were dressed in a provocative manner. I would like to believe that we are better than that.

So through psychological pressure, some thousands decided to end their existence. Who will be held accountable for said pressure? By acting ( applying economic pressure) or omitting (immediate social protection measures and reassurances) people died. Isn't that a crime? Why should the most powerful among us not be held responsible for their actions that effect from thousands to million souls?

Chancellor: I believe in God, religion is my companion.

It seems the Christian beliefs get altered the further up we move on the European map, eh? Or German Christians are superior to other Christians.

I propose these: Laws to avoid cultural devastation through economic choking and financial assassination and accountability of our "Elite".

Souls demand justice. And they will not be denied.

Let's discuss biological immortality.

The assumption is that someone discovered how to stop the aging of the cells so human beings can no longer die by the degradation of said cells through the aging process. Let's assume that aging reversal is not possible to make this simpler. Also, we can still die by violent and painful "incidents". Let us also assume that the way to achieve this is, relatively easy and cheap and everyone has access to it.

Children will be nonexistent (earth can feed only so many) and if existent will be a privilege to the rich and powerful. Poor people will procreate only when someone dies from a work accident to replenish the workforce.

We could perhaps face racial wars.

I could see forced chemical castrations in exchange for said immortality.

Ritualistic suicides would become a "thing" and be rewarded by the governments.

Probably there will be a caste system introduced with pseudo-religious backing.

Psychological implications from the absence of children. Weakness will no longer be tolerated (like now only worse).

Some sort of global government, 24/7 government surveillance and tracking. Capital punishment will be the norm to "weed out the criminal genes, make more room for the law abiding citizens", even for slight offenses.

A global reduction to wars due to one government and its probable genocidal treatment of rebellious countries.

Plastic surgeries and technologies will be constantly evolving even to the point of altering human DNA for "beauty", (eyes, skin, height, voice modulation, both genitals, even nonfunctioning wings).

Absolute change in morality. No fear of death or divine retribution will lead to debauchery which in turn lead to more and more extreme ways to pleasure oneself.

Humankind will travel to the far reaches of the universe and advance science to its limit (if there is one). Diseases will be a thing of the past (those not man made at least to thin the pack).

Slavery or cloning or A.I. solutions will have to be chosen with their repercussions.

A funny scenario providing a small amount of thinking for all of us.

We imagine everyone having access. What if only a few? We would face an Egyptian God-Kings scenario.

I will probably revisit these scenarios in a later post.

Tragedy and comedy. Which is greater is a question tormenting us since their inception. For the answer comes from the taker, the recipient, not the giver and not the act which comprises the essence with which we differentiate the two, but rather the spirit of the viewer in that time, in that place, in that company.

Why? But of course, because tragedy exalts the actor/protagonist and humbles the audience while comedy humbles the actor and exalts the audience.

We feed, we water, we protect the animals. We save them and we destroy them on a whim. Doesn't that make us their Gods? How much courage does it take for a dog to turn and bite its God? Could that be the purpose of our existence on this Earth? To kill our own Gods?

It is my experience that at a certain age people must stop their occupation with the political life. The logic is as follows: Through politics, you shape and influence the world in which you live. Beyond a certain age however you shape and influence the world in which someone else will live. The needs of every generation as well as the environment which shapes each generation change. Isn't it reasonable that shaping the life of the next generation with the imagination of the previous one breeds and will breed, only destruction?

The road that someone traveled seems to be much more important than the place of his residence. It is really challenging to conceptualize the totality of Odysseas Elytis' poem explaining to us that the journey is more important than the destination.

The truth is that we are in a state of constant traveling - not the distances of Odysseus perhaps -  but incessantly and daily. And every day, our steps, the road we choose to take is different. In a constant flux. It changes from moment to moment as thousands of passengers leave their mark. And every road has its own memory.

I don't doubt for a second that most -if not all the roads- try to forget rather than remember.

Let's think of our birth as the flow of molten metal in a mold shaped as a key. However contrary to usual molds, this one is not ready, it is being created slowly with the passing of time, thought to thought, action to action. The molten metal though does not wait for us to finish the mold, it keeps flowing all the while. Sometimes we haven't even started creating the mold and the metal returns to its source, molten as it begun.

Some other times the key mold is not fully done when the molten metal comes and it will not be able to open the lock of the door it was meant to open, but it *will* open another door which was created at the very moment the shape of the half-made key was final. These doors which open with the half made keys sometimes happen to be the most important ones of all.

Every key is made from the same metal but no two keys are alike. There is a unique locked door for every key and behind every door lies the solution of the mystery of its key's existence.