The world "is approaching a point where 'Star Wars' will not be just a film," and the US is not ready
The world is approaching "a point where 'Star Wars' will not be just ...
The world "is approaching a point where 'Star Wars' will not be just a film," and the US is not ready
The world is approaching "a point where 'Star Wars' will not be just a film," and the Pentagon admits it is not ready for a space war, as revealed by several experts and US politicians consulted by Politico.
The article notes that Russia and China are "far ahead" of the United States. in the development of means capable of destroying or rendering inoperative the satellites on which the US Army depends. "for everything": from gathering intelligence, to guiding precision bombs, missiles and drones.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon is trying to catch up after years of underinvestment, injecting "billions of dollars" to bolster its defenses against antisatellite weapons, train troops and refine means to retaliate in a new form of combat. .
"We are increasingly dependent on space, and our adversaries know it" "Now we are approaching a point where 'Star Wars' will not be just a film," warns Steve Isakowitz, director of The Aerospace Corp., a government-funded think tank that serves as the Army's chief adviser. in the space. In these circumstances, the USA he can no longer afford to take his domain for granted, the expert warns.

And, according to Isakowitz, "that supremacy in space" has allowed Washington "to have the greatest combat capability of war in the world." However, it has also made "every day more and more, literally", Washington "becomes dependent" on space, and "our adversaries know it".
Not surprisingly, US President Donald Trump recently called for the creation of a "space force": a separate military branch responsible for guaranteeing US supremacy in space (a role now played mainly by the Air Force). Likewise, Trump's new National Security Strategy designated space as "vital interest" for the first time, and ordered the Armed Forces to consider space as "a priority domain," Politico recalls.
"We can not allow adversaries to take our eyes and ears" Some, however, think that it is not enough. Congressman Mike Rogers, who chairs the Strategic Forces Subcommittee of the Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, predicts that war in space will "happen," and that "it's just a matter of whether it happens in the next two years or in the next five or six years. "
In this sense, the politician is worried about whether the US Air Force is paying enough attention to space. "They always say: 'We have this, we are planning this in the future,'" says Rogers. "But when you ask them to prioritize space this year, they say they can not," he laments.

"People have to remember that when it comes to fighting in a war, our eyes and ears are in space, we can not allow adversaries to take our eyes and ears," says the congressman.
Other specialists urge the Trump Administration to think more carefully about its military space policy. Thus, Joan Johnson-Freese, a professor of national security at Naval War College, doubts that space can be treated like any other battle zone. "You can not control all the space all the time," he says, explaining that "simply the physics of space is different than the others."
"An armed conflict in space would be catastrophic for all" On the other hand, Cassandra Steer, acting executive director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law of the University of Pennsylvania, warns that "an armed conflict in space would be catastrophic for all players," including "neutral states. , commercial actors and international civil society. "
In this sense, he considers that the biggest challenge would be to develop a space defense that does not become an offensive.
"How do we protect our space assets without creating the exact conditions for an arms race that leads to war in space?" The analyst asks and warns: "Try to dominate space in the way that the United States dominates other sites It could be a very bad idea. "