as a digital nation we should have digital resources.. the best resource is our magazine ROOM.. now that we have ROOM with Asgardia we should take advantage of this combination.. we could make an Asgardian library with a section ROOM for example.. some articles (old news) for free and others by payment (interviews).. loose or in bundles.. make media library's or app's from high quality picture's.. in the meanwhile promote ROOM for subscriptions true Asgardia memberships/citizenship's.. take Carol under the arm and promote her to minister of library's.. Grtz, Dirk.

a thought that came from my previous post.. i found out in "Stellarium" that jupiter and saturn go near each other and go away from each other every 60 years.. so that makes a slingshot around the sun every 60 years viewed from the sun when the highlight is the alignment of the two.. that alone would create a big difference on the disk of the sun to start imbalances.. these imbalances would create sun-spots.. - on the other side we have the close planets that have a faster cycle and more alignments with themselves and close planets.. if we view from the sun to venus for example we can see many sub-alignments of the inner planets with the more outward planets.. all these variables should be accounted for if we start talking about solar cycles of sunspots.. the sunspots have no live or cycle on their own.. it comes from outside forces towards the sun.. and the same goes for nearby stars and other big forces in the nearby space.. Grtz, Dirk.

lets talk about a couple of forces that go with each other.. if we have a force that is of a certain amount then its impact to the outside is of the same amount regarding the first force.. lets take this to something practical.. if the earth has a certain degree of gravity then the magnetic force should mirror that degree of force true its magnetism.. so if we know the gravity and magnetism of earth we could use that as a measurement for other things in the solarsystem.. if we would use this standard on the solarsystem then the mass should mirror its magnetic shield.. - if we now look at the outside of the solar system then we see things coming in and going out.. some of these stay with us and are adding to the mass.. so the magnetic forces of impacted body's will rise according to this incoming masses.. and higher mass means then higher magnetism.. think of it as heavier disk versus stronger jets.. - we could also use this for the earth.. the more mass we put in space the less magnetism will be generated true the jets.. here we can also use the example of hot and cold.. the less heat true the disk the less cold true the jets or poles.. - for our sun it usually means the more impacts from outer space the more magnetic reactions.. here we have also the placements of the planets.. when the planets are traveling in groups around the sun or are traveling more dispersed around the sun.. this way they create less or more holes of income-ways for asteroids to the sun.. - from the tail of the magnetic field of the sun we have not much info.. but it should be a place where things leave our solar-system and therefore affect the main magnetic field of the sun.. also a possibility is that magnetism comes in to our solar-system from behind true the cold sources of the space around us.. - so to form another idea.. more impacts on earth for example is not a bad way for the future.. as it adds new mass and makes the magnetic field stronger.. the same goes for our solarsystem.. if we would look at it from a very big scale we should add more mass to our space-ship named the solar-system to augment its protective magnetic shield.. Grtz, Dirk.

what if we would setup our own digital space organization.. the org. could refer to everything to do with our space program.. from digital embassies to digital space-ports and space-arks.. we could run it like a sort of simulation towards the future.. we setup the framework and graphics and invite all things related to space on earth to visit us.. we could also run it a side the gov. and the nation, maybe somewhere in between as a new dimension to Asgardia.. we could build it also as an expanded business environment.. Grtz, Dirk.

if we would divide our digital work among the Asgardians then the route we would have to take is the route of numbers.. lets take 10000 digital workers that work 1 hour each week then that would sum up to 10k hours each week, 45k hours each month, 540k hours per year.. Grtz, Dirk.

if we would see the earth and the moon as 2 magnets then where would be the connection point or the force point.. is it possible to generate energy from the force between 2 magnets?.. it can be a pushing force or an attracting force.. could we not reverse engineer an electric motor in space with these magnetic forces?.. if we view it somewhat bigger we could start with the biggest magnetic forces in the solar-system.. lets say between jupiter and a moon of jupiter or other ones.. or between the sun and the earth for example.. we can profit from the sensibility from space to work with low forces.. just an in between idea.. Grtz, Dirk.

i think it would be a good image if we would go for more green in Asgardia.. green in space is a necessity if we are planning to stay long terms.. green is the foundation of humans.. the blue earth mixed with the yellow sun gives life in the form of greens, and we humans depend on all tree colors.. - first it is a living companion that will save lives many times.. it is also a de-stressing factor as if we would walk under the green leaves of trees.. it is also a very advanced form of transforming the spectrum into energy.. - with these greens come also the needed bacteria which we need in our guts.. the bacteria are giving the minerals which higher forms of life need.. so we should not forget the rocks in powder form.. further we need living water to keep everything healthy.. - i have had a life with many roads to greens.. maybe it is time for me to go this path of greens in space.. i see many young people go for green in space and that is a good sign for the future.. let us just imagine a green mars with edited plants which can resist the harsh conditions on mars.. Grtz, Dirk.

in my country there is a discussion going on about which is better, namely gas vs nuclear.. both sides are trowing mud and stones to each-other and that will give no results.. why are we not building hybrid-energy-installations?.. it can be run in the best way with a choices of least waste.. - btw i still stand for nuclear power in space ones we leave our orbit.. so why not use nuclear waste for that purpose.. fossil fuels can be used for emergency situations.. then all the ones we get from nature as a basic energy source supported by nuclear in case of need.. - the question is.. can we as a space-nation help with the start of such a global energy project where every nation does his part and work together as a unity for one global ecology energy organization.. maybe not much.. but at least we have brought the idea to the world.. Grtz, Dirk.

As a new beginner in zoom i want to forward the idea of zoom-moderators for Asgardia meetings.. the zoom-moderator sets up a meeting room with an organizer and adds peoples to the list to attend the meeting for a certain date and hour.. i would like to pay the moderator for the services with Solars.. good idea or not?.. Grtz, Dirk.

as i wrote the previous post it came to my mind that we had recently news from the voyagers.. they seem to hitting an unknown force.. well, if they are outside the protective magnetic shield of the Sun.. and above the bow that goes with it.. it would be obvious that they would be experiencing statics because they do not have a protective magnetic shield.. and as they are flying before the solarsystem towards the radiation, particles and atoms then that could be the cause of the new measure's.. - maybe that could be an additional safety rule in favor for the big escape-plan.. if we would go towards the tail of the magnetic shield of the solar-system outside the possible jet-burst of the Sun.. this region has a more cool and less active existence in the big magnetic-shield-tail of the Sun.. but in that case we certainly need a hot nuclear source to keep us warm in those outward regions.. Grtz, Dirk.

if we look at Jupiter what can we see.. first it is a cold gas-planet that has stripes.. these stripes have a function, the most light atoms and molecules go to south and north jets and the middle stripe as the disk contains the most heavy ones.. then we have the 4 regions in the 4 corners which are turbulent ones, if we look at it from a 2D-slice-perspective.. - if we would put this knowledge over the sun, that is in fact a burning gas-planet.. then we see similar regions.. the north and south as jet-regions.. then the disk in the middle that has a certain stability.. and then the 4 regions which are in fact an upper and a lower region of the disk, as unstable magnetic regions.. we could say sort of the regions of earthquakes and volcano's on earth.. - so now that we have this picture of the Sun what would be the most save places around the Sun if we could displace ourselves in the long term towards the future.. the disk contains the dust and when that goes novae then a lot of material comes with it towards the planets.. the jets would be more safer, but if they go novae then a lot of hot internal material comes out like plasma and radiation, so neither a good solution.. then we have the X axes with all those turbulence's as an upper and lower part in between the two previous ones.. here we could find a place outside the reach of big bursts.. - ok, so to come to a basic given we could say that the X axes are the safest regions in case of a big Sun-burst or small novae.. so.. if i think at it.. our two messengers as the voyagers are in the safest place because they follow some kind of top-X trajectory's before the Sun in the direction the Sun is going true space.. maybe it is time to send out some more scouts.. maybe 2 towards the tail of the sun outside the south-jet-stream but below the planet-dust-disk.. Grtz, Dirk.

i was just thinking for a way to capture carbon out of the air and water.. after a few ways i had the vision of thermal mud-pool's.. lets say we create a mud with lots of chalk and other carbon absorbing materials and even with carbon-eating bacteria.. then we drive the air and/or water true it.. we could do it like in nature in the form of steam.. i would be curious what result that would have for putting the carbon back in the ground.. Grtz, Dirk.