This story originally appeared on my Medium profile: https://medium.com/predict/transhumanism-can-be-the-ultimate-egalitarianism-or-the-ultimate-elitism-5bab54661a06 There is something to fit every person, personality, and philosophy. But, who gets access and who doesn’t? The term transhuman can seem quite ambiguous. And, in some sense, it is. It encompasses a wide range of human augmentations and enhancements: From ...
This story originally appeared on my Medium profile: https://medium.com/predict/transhumanism-can-be-the-ultimate-egalitarianism-or-the-ultimate-elitism-5bab54661a06
There is something to fit every person, personality, and philosophy. But, who gets access and who doesn’t?
The term transhuman can seem quite ambiguous. And, in some sense, it is. It encompasses a wide range of human augmentations and enhancements: From mind-uploading into an android, digital immortality in the cloud, gene-editing to protect against disease and stop aging, augmentation to enhance performance in every sense of the word, cryonic suspension after death, all the way to simply replacing failing physiological systems, and literally everything in between or beyond. There is no known limit to what can potentially be done to evolve humans beyond the current biological limitations.
Because of the limitless possibilities, it is important that we begin talking about what this means for humanity and the future of governance. There are many organizations who recognize the need for taking steps now to ensure people have the autonomy to decide if they want augmentations or not. Or, to decide how to take care of their future as these technologies become more common. One of these organizations is the United States Transhumanist Party. It was formed in 2014 by Zoltan Istvan when he ran for President during the 2016 elections. His vision was to bring the discussion about the future of human augmentation to the mainstream and dispell many of the fears that surround it.
An organization of dedicated members (of which, I am one) is working hard to achieve this goal. Since its founding, it has grown into a worldwide movement for those who recognize that the technology we once believed was only science fiction is now on the brink of becoming reality. Our old ways of governing society are no longer good enough. There must be a change in the thought process.
Change? But, Why?
You may question why we should overhaul the political framework that has seemingly served us so well in the past. The answer to that is fairly straightforward: This is unlike any other time in human history. We have had many political systems throughout human history, and they always evolve. The idea of keeping things as they are now won’t work in an age where technological innovation is going to profoundly change humanity more than ever before.
We could compare it to the industrial revolution, but I contend that this comparison is severely lacking in grasping the entirety of the situation. There are some people who advocate for putting a sentient AI in place of a president and some who argue the opposite. Some argue that once we break the barrier to reversing/slowing down/stopping aging, term limits will need to be imposed on certain governmental positions that currently have none. Imagine an immortal as a SCOTUS. What ramifications could this have?
Governance AND Economy are On-The-Table
I cannot stress hard enough how close we are to bringing about a technological age that seems highly far-fetched to those who are outside of the sphere of techno-optimism. We only see a small portion of it right now, but it increasingly becoming part of our daily lives? Automation. With every small step — such as autonomous vehicles, and stores where you don’t even scan your items, you just pick them up and walk out of the store — we exponentially increase the power of these technologies to drastically change our future.
And, it’s not just robots that put the monetary system as we know it at risk of collapse. What happens when Neuralink and similar tech becomes more widely available, and you are forced to compete with someone who now has augmented cognitive faculties? Do you believe they deserve to earn more money because they provide a greater service? If they can do the jobs of 3 people, where does that leave you? Would you augment yourself to compete? Do you believe you have a right to be able to compete if you so desire?
Elon Musk's Neuralink implant will "merge" humans with AI
Tesla founder Elon Musk has launched tech startup Neuralink to build implants that connect human brains with computer…
www.dezeen.com
How about the “designer babies” that will soon be arriving who are genetically pre-dispositioned to have higher intelligence capabilities? How does a normal person compete with them in terms of employment qualifications? But, there is a caveat to this scenario. And, that is the more augmentation and automation that occurs, the fewer jobs are available. What then?
Can’t Stop the Tsunami
This and more is inevitable and within a relatively very short timeframe. You may think you won’t be alive to see most of these advancements, but you could be quite wrong on that. You also may believe that it won’t affect you very much while you are alive. Are you willing to take that chance?
The tsunami is coming and it is virtually impossible to stop. All we can do is to ensure we fortify our communities and infrastructure to minimize the potential damage such a tsunami can cause. And, that fortification begins with you recognizing the weak points, then working to improve them.
So, What Really Demands My Consideration?
The US Transhumanist Party has laid out a detailed framework for important considerations moving forward. Many of the issues that we need to bring into the open include, but are not limited to:
• Individual privacy and liberty over how to apply technology to one’s personal life.
• Tolerance and inclusivity of all individuals of all races, genders, classes, religions, creeds, national origins, and other characteristics.
• Support of most technologies but opposition to certain detrimental technologies (e.g., weapons of mass destruction, privacy-infringing technologies, engineering of new pathogens).
• Opposition to nuclear weapons, support of complete nuclear disarmament, even if unilateral.
• Support for research on the eradication of disease.
• Morphological freedom.
• Support of all values and efforts toward cultivation of science, technology, reason.
• Support of all emerging technologies that improve the human condition, including:
° Autonomous vehicles
° Electric vehicles
° Economical solar power
° Safe nuclear power
° Hydroelectricity
° Geothermal power
° Applications for the sharing of durable goods
° Artificial intelligence
° Biotechnology
° Nanotechnology
° Robotics
° Rapid transit
° 3D printing
° Vertical farming
° Electronic devices to detect and respond to trauma
° Beneficial genetic modification of plants, animals, and human beings
• Ending the drug war.
• Reforming the prison system to reduce the incarcerated population.
• Universal Basic Income (UBI) — not conditional on life circumstances, occupations, other income, or wealth.
• Reasonable measures to fund space travel.
• Using science and technology to eliminate disabilities.
• Ending the two-party duopoly.
• Life extension / anti-aging.
• Removal of barriers to medical research and deployment of treatments.
• Reducing the national debt.
• Alternative sources of energy and technological implementations.
• Increasing the budget of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
• Support for political, economic, and cultural experimentation — e.g., seasteads and micronations.
• Children’s rights proportional to their rational faculties.
• Animal welfare (but not “animal liberation”).
• Opposition to intolerant, rights-violating, anti-technological, and compulsion-imposing doctrines be they religious or secular.