You don't want HTML. You want a way to use **bold** or *italic* and links and lists and stuff like that. We already got that (not 100% working at the moment AFAIK) The forum already uses Markdown: See https://github.com/adam-p/markdown-here/wiki/Markdown-Cheatsheet

@ Lonahora, That would also work.... when you post a link wrap it in `< Your Link >` (with no spaces) so that it becomes clickable

There are no plans for BBCodes as far as I know. There is no technical logic reason for limiting the size of a topic as long as it gets sanitized. Ultra long replies could collapse to a standardized reply height when a specific soft limit has been exceeded. Since publishing content to a forum is kind of open sourcing it, you may consider to use GitBook. Take a look

>It doesn't have to be profitable, that's just unavoidable. The opening statement suggests it's indeed the case, And not just for sale to earth, the amount of space available combined with the fact we already know it's possible suggests it's assuredly giving returns. For the sale to Earth, by 2050, definitely. And not just novelty. Food will be a valuable comodity. Arable farming space is already at a premium, and population growth will make that problematic. Look into it. Microgravity isn't good for long term exposure for people - sure, there might be farming potential, but long term habitation is a problem. A whole list of problems. As to "wasting gravity" - providing axial rotation to an entire vessel, or even a small part therof - isn't overly difficult to achieve. It doesn't cost money as much as it costs energy - and with establishing energy farms as well as traditional, this can be rendered "costless". Besides, to get to realistically consider such endeavours such concepts will of been rendered moot, and even something primitive like solar panels can provide enough to get it spinning "costless", either as a total mass or just a toroid section connected to a static spire buffered with fluid bearings.

Scrabs, I think what Adolru means by 'wasting gravity' is that 'making' artificial gravity costs extra money. Therefore it is best that everything that can be done in microgravity, should be done in microgravity, so that we don't 'waste' precious gravity. Greeting Jens

How do you "waste" gravity? Even if it is simulated by axial rotation, it's either there or not. Fish and plants would be like humans - they would behave in a predictable manner when subject to "normal" gravity. Putting zero / microgravity into the equation created unnessary issues and unpredictability.

it will be easier to calculate with such symbols. What is special here(unlike "0" - "9") is that these symbols are not only tell you the number. they are the number. When I look for example on the symbol "7", I got the info that I have 7. but I don't really see 7. I just see "7". In order to use 7, I need to see it. using "7" I forced also to image it in some way, for example by using the fingers or imagination. "7" only give the info that there is 7. My version of 7 not only give the info that there is 7, but also show 7. the same about all my numbers. and this is the advantage. I invested hard thought on think about simple geometric shapes that easy and fast as possible to write them. The greater the number, the task became much more difficult (think of a simple geometric shape which this advantage). it may take a little more time to write number greater than 5. But I believe that it is really worth it. You might invest quarter second to write the number. But the number you wrote down may help you calculate more easily. I think it's worth the little energy.

well its as fun haha , well its a possibility ( even if remote since we for the time begin will not create a nem language,and we who are adults already will be dificulty to learn a new count system,it can begin to be teach to our child if necessary haha)