response from Rebekah the lead admin in the post about the Decre N3 about the ID (obs i dont know how to quote here haha): Hello BohZao! The third level of certification is the last step before becoming a full citizen of Asgardia. As any new citizen must agree to the principles of the nation that they are joining, community members must agree to the constitution and declaration before becoming a full citizen. Once they do, they will receive an ID Card. More details on it will be released closer to Unity Day. Kind regards, Rebekah Berg, Lead Community Administrator, Asgardia

Actually, I'm kind of in agreement to the stance Phicksur holds. It's not as if you can tell what it is by the link itself, and randomly clicking things isn't wise - especially if you're one of the masses that tends to execute code as default. I personally wouldn't (and didn't) click it just because it's youtube and would rather prevent generating usable data for them by downloading it remotely. I'm loathed to waste b/w on my host connection in throwing that media back here without knowing what it is. The general trend on the interwebs is someone spits a link with an abstract comment - 10,000,000 people think it's brilliant, and it turns out it's just a dog in a hat and a complete waste of time, effort and bandwidth. Where as the links that are accompanied by some form of tangible details should indicate if you would be potentially interested in following it before sending GET requests.

Sustaining 200 people is by no means small*. We currently find it challenging to simply take care of the few people on ISS (maximum is SEVEN). Even if we took a minimalist approach to such a structure that is likely to be extremely unhealthy on the mental well-being of that many people in a cramped, extremely isolated environment. You have a great idea but the scale seems too large in the short term. In my humble opinion your idea is already at the level of a "large scale habitat". Perhaps scaling down to a number of smaller, mobile, and modular (can connect with others within series to make larger structures). We could staff them with 4 multidisciplinary crew members (emergency management planners, medics, and engineers). If I may add to your idea, that seems to meet your ideas: something smaller before any large-habitats, something that provides a service and contributes to society/our economy. I realize size here is subjective, my only point of reference I can rely on is current technological capability and practice now. I wouldn't be surprised if in the near future (~50 years from now) 200 humans in space at the same time on a single platform is considered small. Sincerely, Manny

I find merits in your argument, but I also find myself thinking to myself, "Go big, or go home." The vast majority of the technology used to survive in space is already well-tested and publicly available. It isn't cheap, but it is available. Who would our 'customers' be? It isn't like countries would send a spacecraft into orbit and then go, "Wow, orbit cost more fuel than I expected. I should stop by Asgardia Fuel Depot and grab some more fuel!" So, while the idea is a sound one, I don't really see it actually being feasible.

Very well said John, I've been perusing the boards and even catch myself thinking decades ahead. I think our endeavors need to be "grounded" as you've described so that when our descendants finally do "reach for the stars" they're stepping off from a strong foundation that was established by the first Asgardian works and research. We're here to ensure humanity can be at its best when that day comes.

I agree that clarification would be helpful. From the information available it appears that the Founders primary goal is to create an unmanned armed platform in space to protect earth from space threats and ICBM threats controlled by Artificial intelligence http://ashurbeyli.eu.com/news9-Igor-Ashurbeyli-press-release.html "The control system would be entirely automatic and free from human bias, allowing it to make decisions about striking dangerous military launches, regardless of their country of origin. To be acceptable to governments around the globe it must be an international platform with completely transparent intellectual property rights and open architecture. Funding and the right to use it must belong to all mankind - encompassing advanced nations and developing countries alike, with no restrictions or boundaries" .Given his background this makes sense. It looks as if the process envisaged is to bring the world together under one umbrella with regard to Space which would infer that the few countries who have invested heavily in space would need to relinquish National interests in favour of a new world organisation that would serve all humanity. We can debate elsewhere the trust issues that will arise but the theory sounds good. The digitising the Noosphere is somewhat vague and the method to do this is certainly open to debate. the def. is "the sphere of human consciousness and mental activity especially in regard to its influence on the biosphere and in relation to evolution" and if we are to digitise it it sounds very much like Artificial Intelligence is the theme. I would welcome input from those that actually have contact with the Founders on this issue for a more detailed explanation of what and how it is thought that digitising the noosphere is to be achieved. There are strong indications that apart from these two goals and Space law which will be the main focus of the founders, other goals for One humanity One unity take a back seat and maybe have not even been decided upon. Maybe that is for the Citizens to decide. if so lets hear that officially. Summary...1 Unmanned platform controlled by AI 2 AI increasingly used to more efficiently and effictively manage , govern and benefit Humanity ( as it is better ,,, arguably and that will be the hot debate...are we willing/ ready to lose control in favour of AI even with alleged fail safe functions embedded? ADD.. with the prominence of AI inferred by the information available it would be good to take a look at where we are on this and where we think we are going so here are some links so we can see the current world view http://www.businessinsider.com/researchers-predictions-future-artificial-intelligence-2015-10/#pieter-abbeel-says-robots-will-keep-us-safer-especially-from-disasters-1 http://www.bbc.com/future/tags/artificialintelligence https://ctovision.com/the-complete-list-of-truly-useful-artificial-intelligence-tools-you-can-use-today/ https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=artificial+intelligence+the+future&FORM=HDRSC4 Here is one of my personal favourite issues " Adaptations we see today While the idea of a post-work future is still largely theoretical, we are already engineering at least three important societal and industrial “adaptations” that may signal its eventual arrival: 1. Moving Toward an Agricultural Post-Scarcity Future: Today, there is a direct relationship between how much people work and their ability to afford basic necessities. But, what if we engineered far more sustainable methods of (or alternatives to) agriculture, thus ushering in a post-scarcity future where it becomes much easier and cheaper to feed ourselves? It’s already starting. Some examples: Personal Food Computers: Researchers have built a device that controls humidity, illumination and air temperature, among other variables. The goal is to decouple climate from geography by building a “catalog of climates.” Urban and “Floating” Farming: The world’s first floating dairy farm, which is expected to be completed in January 2017 in Rotterdam, will grow food for the cows on board. Vegetarian Cities: The mayor of Turin, Italy, Chiara Appendino, wants the city to be the first vegetarian city. Synthetic, Agriculture-Free Products: A start-up in San Francisco is making synthetic wine without grapes. " http://www.businessinsider.com/workless-future-and-why-ai-will-advance-humanity-2016-11

Hi Elle.noir, The emails will be coming out in batches regarding the certificates. Please be patient. Their email will be coming out soon so they too can get their certificates!

As Asgardia is open to everyone, I'm not sure you would be able to ask them to "join". Maybe when it finally happens we will find that the first colonists are Asgardians....

There have been a large number of suggestions for feature enhancements on the forums. This link includes some of the enhancements being worked on. This list by no means is complete. Due to the sheer volume of suggestions, these are being prioritized and once developed announcements will be made upon their launch.

It's probably why it wouldn't be wise to weaponized it immediately. Other countries might correctly sees it as a direct threat above their heads... whatever if we say that we're aiming our weapons on asteroids and against "vilain ETs". Countries are use to deal with other countries at their geographical borders... but technically, Asgardia could be at "few rocket's pschitt" of everyone's geographical space borders. Therefore, we'll need very solid international diplomacy exchanges and international embassies on Asgardia. It's a complicated subject, and there's almost as many arguments for and against it (maybe only to install defensive counter mesures, and bringing bigger stuff from the UN when facing something bigger threats like an asteroid or the Marsians :P) . The most important thing is to not repeat the same mistakes that Earth's nations did... nor to spend 1/3 of our budget for turning Asgardia into a missiles space station.

As there is a defined section in our FAQ to answer this issue we will be locking this post to prevent any further confusion. Thank you for your understanding.

Just jogging through the posts and found my own one, cool. Anyone can be an ambassador regardless of education, all you need is patience, understanding and compassion, if as the now banned EyeR said you need to be 'educated' I disagree with that remark. Who is 'educated' enough to be an ambassador to any ET's we may encounter? after all the current governments of this world state Aliens don't exist so what damage can be done? There are probably more contactee's out there suitable to be an ambassador and I think I'd trust them more than any politician (who are trained to lie for a living) or corporate flunky (who are motivated by greed and self congratulation) to conduct contact appropriately. I personally think you need someone who has the whole of Humanities best interests at heart rather than some bureaucrat.

Asgardians all over the world, in their home countries, should become involved in different types of community projects in order to develop the foundations of Asgardia as a space nation and its contribution to the well being of human society on earth. Asgardians should be committed to this endeavor as pioneers for the future generations of asgardians on earth and outer space. All projects should be coordinated under the respective Asgardia embassy in the country where the project is located. I believe that at this time it is not appropriate to involve any alien race in the internal affairs of Asgardia. [CONTENT REMOVED] *** **MOD EDIT** A personal attack against another member of this group has been removed from this post. Personal attacks are not allowed as per our group posting rules namely, rule #3. "Personal Attacks. No personal attacks against other users of the forum shall be allowed. This includes (and is not limited to) insults, inappropriate remarks and excessive aggressive behavior towards your fellow Asgardian. Please ensure to apply common sense and respect the views of your fellow Asgardians. In case of a disagreement, please keep the debate amicable. Escalation of a discussion may result in your post being edited to remove offensive content, or even in the thread being locked." Any posts found that contain personal attacks will be recorded and removed. - *Jason Rainbow 15 January 2017 @ 06:09 pm*