Hello all,
I have a simple question for you do you all think the project will succeed? Perhaps I should be more specific, currently with the situation here on the forum where some folks seem to have lost confidence in the MODS and Admins and where a ...
I can see what you mean, honestly that's a good question, I think we should people through thorough test so no freaks out from isolation and closterphobia i think I spelt that wrong, which I don't have those but they can develops with anyone.
Considering the ISS has winows smalls ones admittedly but windows all the same. I personally do not see any reason why having windows would not be possible. Also, no matter what is done a replicated view will never be guaranteed to have the same effects. As being able ...
hi
Psychological Fear is often connected to and confused with anger. A man loses his job and says: I didn’t feel fear when I lost my job. I was angry! But fear is a natural reaction in such a situation due to the uncertainty of ...
I don't know much about this technology, but I think it would be easier to 3D print metal in space because of reasons: you don't have to create vacuum for electron emission gun and for vacuum atomization. Also there is no gravity, it means you can print ...
@
Phicksur
Jason was joking: point
5.a
doesn't exist in CoC. ;-)
I am glad it did.
This brings up the very point of why censorship is counter-productive. As a curious-minded individual, I want to know what that last bit was. I do not care if it was illegal, immoral, or heinous. I am just wanting to know the ...
Reviving the topic just to answer a couple of questions, even though they do not deserve a response given the rude nature of them. First off bog, I do not do any drugs and secondly, I can present you with a compelling argument in support of their being intelligent ...
Hello there !
I see this topic went off the rail ! If you read head of the topic, it says: "Does anyone think it possible that ET might just stop by for a visit?" - why do you need any proof or solid evidences of - ...
Brandon7, I do fully understand your concern and scepticism. So far more than 170+k individual shown interest unfortunately there are a handful of us participating in forums, I am sure neither of us has this delusion that there will be complete agreement on everything. We simply express our differences, ...
Brandon7, I do fully understand your concern and scepticism. So far more than 170+k individual shown interest unfortunately there are a handful of us participating in forums, I am sure neither of us has this delusion that there will be complete agreement on everything. We simply express our differences, as a result of human nature we sometimes over react. It is childish to seek consensus every on topic we brought up even it sound just.
In case of Asgardia and what is currently going on at forum level are two separate issues.
Asgardia is a project which we should not underestimate the size and scope wise. On the other hand, individuals, expressing disagreement, further more getting obsessed with it and prejudice.
Do we really believe that, a successful businessman and a potentially successful business venture will fail because MOD's of a forum are unjust ? Or the managers of the project, taking in the account, the human nature and weaknesses didn't built in the project the safe guards.
We must evaluate a project based on certain criteria whether they are smart or not.
Is the project specific, in our case it is, objectives are clearly defined with in the content of Concept of Asgardia, further more prioritized as, establish a state, put up a satellite, ...
We must evaluate a project based on certain criteria whether they are smart or not.
Is the project specific, in our case it is, objectives are clearly defined with in the content of Concept of Asgardia, further more prioritized as, establish a state, put up a satellite, apply for UN membership. Eventually forming up a space nation hoping to care for mother earth in better way
Is the project measurable, although it is not clearly shared but Mr. Ashurbeyli's team must definitely budgeted it. Besides the data regarding the cost and resources needed can easily be traced or accumulated to cross check.
Is the project attainable, so far it seems progressing OK. After been announced there has been over 600+k applicants shown interest, nearly more than 1 qtr of it, 176+k converted their interest to some sort of commitment A declaration of unity and content table of constitution published to be reviewed before being offficialized.
Is it relevant, taking in the consideration the current conjecture of world affairs and how unresponsively we are treating nature, etc. And unfortunate fact that nothing is being done effectively except holding conferences by the acting statesmen of the world. At some responsible capacity we must try to do something.
is there a time frame attached to it. Current events demonstrated that there is ticking time agenda exist. By April 16 we will have a Declaration of Unity, by June 18 we will be at a position to vote for constitution and move forward a new phase of citizenship with more defined responsibilities and obligations for the project.
Conclusion: taking in the consideration two different aspects of the project technical wise above argument, up to a certain extent will justify the creditability and potential for success. This at least will enables us to achieve the prior objectives under the assumption that will be financed by Mr. Ashurbeyli's business. But human side of success very much depends on us. Managing our differences, showing ability to tolerate each other and ideas, overcoming the challenge of working with each other in unity will decide the future and success of this project. I am optimistic existing and future Asgardians have that will.
I believe that it is entirely dependent on funding, as many things are in this life...