We truly appreciate such posts. We need the help of the community in order to offer a smooth experience, both here and on Facebook, so be sure to offer feedback in terms of how the staff is working, and be sure to contact any of the global admins if you believe that a member of the staff is acting unfairly or unfairly taking advantage of their positions. Thank you!

Thank you, it answers my question perfectly, and I am glad to know that we already have a working administrative system/team (even if it is only online at the moment) so early on. And thank you to all of our Mods, Admins, and Chapter heads for doing a wonderful job so far! Keep up the great work!

[ADMIN] Hello everyone thanks for your contributions so far. However, we have an official thread about the type of government we want for the constitution of Asgardia. Official Posts allow us to keep track of all suggestions and keep the sections organized. Please comment in here, thank you :

Ultimately, I personally politically favour Anarchy. A lack of a system can be a system too - and an effective one. At the end of the day, you shouldn't need someone to tell you what's right and what's wrong - you know. You'd also not be really requiring anyone to tell you what to do - you know that too. However, I'm able to accept that some people are just completely unable to cope with taking social responsibility for their own actions/inactions. Even with more than a million citizens, it's still possible for them to decide for themselves. Via a forum structure such as this, we can argue amongst ourselves upon the various merits concerning decisions for a set period of time - assuming this is nothing desperately urgent - and then collectively vote. I'll agree with the opposition to decisions principle, but think it should be set as a % instead of a solid number. Say 60%. To assume that up until the next elections at least the 1'st 100k have a say, then one hundred would be only 1% or so - and not a good representation of the larger societies veiws. 100/600,000 is pretty insignificant. Should a structure develop wherin individuals make their own decisions, then the role of the ministries would be akin to that of mods in forums. An adjudicator ensuring productive conversation, and in cases where no clear agreements can be reached, the arbiter of the ultimate decision. I think proposal for dismissal should also require greater than 100 people - again a fixed percentage, 60% sounds like a good minimal.

@PaulCis: A fundamental string? This reminds me alot of my own theory, in which all of matter and energy particles are composed of a single building block. Using deacy patterns of known particles I was able to derive the nature of a single particle which would be composing every single thing in the universe. The idea behind this single is so efficient, I was even able to find the property of dark matter particles.

I believe there is a pattern to existence.. that is a symphony of frequency. if one were to find out the " vibratory strings" that make structure then we will be able to create at will anything. just a thought .. if anyone asks I would be more than happy to explain my ideas

there is something I would like to address "the dogma of science " there has been many cases to where reports or findings are ether hindered or skewed in order to hide facts. even now we are seeing this happen in America with the new law stating that science intuitions are not allowed to publicize their findings. So if a theory is debunked or proven otherwise. I would call for a reexamination ( case by case ) of experiments or theories. If the presenter has strong evidence of their conclusion then of course proceed with experimentation. or even if there is none then a solid idea or theory then I believe the chance should be given to fully discover the truth.