Personally, I like to think that we shouldn't limit ourselves to supporting what's currently there. I want us to be on the moon, mars, and commercial space stations within the next 20 years. I see it happening. Why dream small? It takes people like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Bill Gates to be able to support missions like these that are going on. This 'project' isn't really a project. It's an adventure to start exploring our universe. We're creating a new nation. One that pulls away from 'Earthly' thought processes and starts to create new evolutionary ideals. Leo

The best way is to be involved here in the forums. In this way you can keep up with the topics that most interest you. Also there will be announcements periodically when any official statements are made. You can find the announcements here, To visit the list of forums just select the Forum Index at the top of this page. From there you will see a list of forums for topics already in progress that you may be interested in. Let us know if you have any questions. Enjoy!

Layka 1954 birth date 1957 death date It gives its life for the sake of humanıy. Thank you @yahoo

Elbette Asgardiya bir devlet olarak Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından tanınacaksa, ABD'nin bunda onayı olacaktır. bunu yadsımıyorum. Tepkim ilk postunuzda Trump'ın Asgardiya'ya vereceği destek konusundaki optimist yorumunuzaydı. Fazla destek beklemeye gerek yok, Asgardiya'yı tanısınlar yeterli diye düşünüyorum. :) Asgardiya tüm dünya uluslarından insanların oluşturacağı bir ütopya şimdilik. Ayrımcılığa, ayrıştırıcılığa yer olmamalı. Sadece ilk eylemleri ayrıştırmaya yönelik olan bir başkanın bir ütopyaya destek vereceğini düşünmüyorum. Sağlıcakla kalın.

Undoubtedly there will be many nations over which Asgardia will orbit. Some will have opposing views and may even be at war with one another. Whatever personal views we might have about terrestrial politics, showing any kind of preference will distract from the serious endeavor to protect our planet. I hope for cooperation on an International scale. We simply have to get World leaders on board. Donald Trump is aware of space junk, or maybe I should say the cost to America. This is one small step for the American president.

S. Crawford: "Patriotism has nothing to do with women's rights, it has to do with a love for one's country." Patriotism is toxic to humanity. It is "my country right or wrong", when all should be willing to oppose their own country if its policies and actions are against the interests of humanity. I do not consider someone's patriotism a positive attribute. What is the person's attitude to humanity? "Are you then arguing that Donald Trump does not love his country?" I have no idea whether Donald Trump loves his country. I know he's disparaged many other countries and cultures during his campaign, and many of his supporters are happy to consider that the same thing. Whether he loves America, and not simply the opportunities that it offers him for wealth and power, I cannot know - and nor can you. "He may be misguided, but he doesn't hate America (quite literally) as George W Bush did, and as many other prominent Globalist Cabal members did." I am not interested in conspiracy theories. Nor do I care about George W. Bush, who is not the US President. "He has an expressed an interest--genuine or not--in bettering America: "Make America Great Again"." Indeed. But I am not interested in America. I am interested in humanity - including Americans. It's also worth noting that Hitler rose to power on a promise to make Germany great again. If you do not see the parallels, if you cannot see why people are concerned over the populist wave that brought this man to power, than you urgently need to read more about recent history. "Never has Donald Trump spoken ill of America, America's constitution, the people of America in totality, or any other attack on America as an entity in and of itself." I think that, alone of all the things he might have said and did say, that would have damaged his chances of becoming president. "What you are doing, with all due respect, is confounding words with action." What I am doing is refusing to excuse words. Words have great power. Words from the mouth of a president, more still. No-one in such an office can be or should be excused their words. "We can't prove that Donald Trump ever "grabbed ( a woman) by the pussy"." We don't need to. His words alone are enough to expose his attitudes, and it is his attitudes that are at issue here. If we could prove he had sexually assaulted a woman then I would expect Americans to be demanding his arrest, not simply his impeachment. This man is not some regular Joe indulging in sick-minded banter in a bar with indulgent friends around him. He is the President. "But one thing I can prove is that Presidents who were NOT Trump have physically done things that the self-proclaimed feminists converging on DC have done nothing about." I am not interested in presidents who were NOT Trump. Trump is the President. "Question for you...Asgardia is supposed to be fact- and science-based. Where is the physical proof that Donald Trump raped a woman, apart from the woman's statements about it? Where is the physical proof that Donald Trump hates minorities, that he is fascist, or that he is a neo-Nazi? These are just words being repeated over and over" In your efforts to defend Trump, you are missing the central point. You think people - including other national leaders and governments - are concerned about Trump because he raped a woman. They aren't. They are concerned because he has expressed, in his own words, an acceptance of such behaviour as normal. As I said, words have great power. And Trump's words are more than enough to expose him as someone who does not have respect for half the population of the country, and of the world. As for hating minorities, being a fascist, or a neo-Nazi ('Nazi', I think, is sufficient in these times): again, Trump's words are the key. If they do not demonstrate hatred (and they certainly do), then they at least demonstrate foolishness, and a lack of strategic thinking. Example: his demonisation of Muslims during his campaign (you wanted evidence of his hating minorities? There you go) was based on the idea that each is just a terrorist waiting to happen. Enough, in the minds of his supporters, to justify his incitement against them. However, it is the openly stated goal of Da'esh (persistently called 'ISIS' in media and online) to drive a wedge between Muslim and non-Muslim in western countries, to create a narrative of 'Islam against the world' to rally disaffected and alienated Muslims to their cause and destabilise the countries that would oppose them. Trump either does not understand this - which shows he is dangerously uninformed on key strategic issues - or he chooses to ignore it for his own purposes, or he chooses to ignore it because he actively supports Da'esh. For the record, I don't believe Trump consciously support Da'esh. But he - like many anti-Muslim groups across the west - is certainly doing their work for them. "These are the lies of the mainstream media, who--when asked for proof--flounder, and then say, "Oh, sorry, we forgot to add that those claims are alleged". Would you not agree that that is "fake news"?" I have already said that I acknowledge the biases and agendas of the media organisations (though I don't subscribe to the conspiracist idea of a monolithic 'mainstream media' pushing a single, unified propaganda). You have stated you trust Fox News, implying that it is you who needs to consider your sources. All news is biased in one direction or another. Also, as you've probably guessed, I am not interested in Hillary either. She is not the President. Donald Trump is. "The USA was founded on "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness". If the US restricts free speech and prevents a lawfully-elected (well, it seems that way) President from performing the duties to which he was elected to perform, then they are trampling all over the idea of liberty." No. That is a key issue here. Trump has come to power according to the technical mechanisms of the American republic - mechanisms that have remained broadly unchanged since the USA's foundation. And again, Hitler came to power in Germany using, at least initially, the legal, functioning mechanisms of the German state. Liberty, and the values America was founded on, are about more than just following the letter of the law. They are about the spirit of the law. Liberty must, sometimes, act against the mechanisms to protect the concept. Trump is legally elected. His legitimacy remains open to question. "If Globalism is your idea of Unity, then that seriously frightens me." Globalism is not a policy. It is a consequence. It is a function of our advancing technology, our ability to communicate in real-time around the world, our ability to travel in ever-shorter times. Globalism is on us, whether we like it or not. We are one species, one humanity, whether we like it or not. You have the choice to remain frightened, and lash out against the facts - that is the appeal of Trump, and Brexit, and Putin, and all other campaigns that put country above humanity - or you can choose to work to better life for yourself and all people. Question your belief in the 'globalist cabal', and see what actually exists: powerful men and organisations manoeuvring to preserve the power and wealth they have, and gain more, and working together and opposing each other as they believe the need arises. And see also the legions of people willing to support them and protect them, as Trump's supporters and defenders do for him. This is what humanity has always been. There is no great conspiracy, no 'New World Order', no Templars, no Masonic 'power behind the throne' that represents a 'them' for 'us' to rally against. There is only 'us', and the world we want to forge for ourselves.

Trump's politics is irrelevant. He is an important world leader. Asgardia should strive to establish and maintain friendly relations with all nations. Picking ideological fights with terrestrial nations is making enemies for the sake of making enemies.

düşünceleriniz çok güzel, umarım aynı çizgide buluştuğumuz insanların sayısı artar. Google translate ne yazık ki çok net tercüme yapamıyor. anlam bozukluğu olabiliyor. hatta bazen anlamsız dahi olabilir. (aynı dili konuştuğumuz insanlarla dahi anlaşamazken çok da sorun değil bence.) yapmak istediğiniz paylaşımı google translate den çevirin ve paylaşın. mutlaka sizi anlayacak birileri çıkacaktır. bir yerden başlamak gerek. siz başlayın nasılsa devamı gelir.

Keşke sana böyle bir bilgi verme imkanım olsa ve sende bu yazılımı yapsan, Süper Olurdu, inan bana

Merhabalar, ben Salih Kurulmasını hayal ettiğiniz bu sistemin kullanımı için Asgardian ID'si girmek gerekliliğini düşünmenizin sebebi nedir acaba? Böyle bir imkan olacaksa bunun herkes tarafından kullanılabilmesi daha hoş olmaz mıydı?

Değerli asgardialı arkadaşım ortak bir paydada buluşmak güzel oldu. Betimleme ihtiyacından bahsettiğin konuyu açacak olursam şayet egzotik madde kavramı reel olan bilimsel bir fenomendir. Solucan delikleri ve kara deliklerin uzun soluklu açık durumda kalmalarını sağlar. Ben genede derimki madem konumuz uzay bizi takip eden tüm asgardialı arkadaşlarımızla nacizane olarak bilgilerimizi paylaşmalıyız. Seninde forum yazılarını merakla bekleyip olumlu yada olumsuz eleştirilerimi dostane ve samimi bir biçimde yapacağımdan şüphen olmasın.

Tamam o zaman, Bilim kurgu roman yazıyorum ve çok fazlada iddalı değilim. Senin yardımına ihtiyacım var, anlatacağım bölüm kitabımdan, Müdahale için dünyaya bir ekip gönderiyorlar fakat Wormhole gibi geçitler sorun yaratabiliyor, yani senin anlayacağın dilden konuşayım durağanlıktan ötürü çöküyor. Ve bende uzun süre bu geçidin içinin açık kalabilmesi için Wormholun olay ufkundan sonraki bölümünü egzotik Madde ile kapladım böylelikle bu Wormhole sorunsuz bir geçit haline gelebilecekti. En azından ekip görevini tamamlayana kadar, Serkan Unalan beye bu kitaptan bahsetmiş ve olumlu bir yanıt almıştım, senden yardım istediğim konu şu, bu yazıda düzeltmemi istediğin yanlış varmı? Saygılarımla