Thank you for voting!

Asgardia we have a problem.. if i take a look from the outside to Asgardia then i can not see any good works for earth or space.. i only see a selfish state.. remember from the outside.. - what can we do with that picture.. should we not be working together with all good initiatives?.. a 1000 ambassador's or volunteers as bridges to such good organizations?.. helping out new startup's with their businesses?.. - all that i know is that we are slipping to the background and no one notices us anymore.. seen from the outside.. we have done a great job the past 5 years to give earth good idea's and paths forward.. should we now not try to integrate into this new space-era?.. - maybe we need some good managers towards the outside as Fernando said?.. we have to be part of it now and stick our foot between the doors.. Grtz, Dirk.

today a story about working.. in the past.. it where not the pharaoh's who build the pyramid's but the slaves.. it where not the kings who build the castles but the masons.. it where not politics who made nations but workers.. so my question is who shall eventually make our spaceships.. - if we now look at Asgardia then we have the levels politic and business in place but those are not the people who will build spaceships.. it will be astronauts who will do a job in space.. something like divers welding under water.. - for Asgardia it would be interesting to start up a working class under analog astronauts who make pieces on earth.. like for example in aluminum.. then with an astronaut-training upgrade them for space.. in fact we can do all these things today to have the space-workers in place for when they are needed in the future with the needed knowledge and experiences.. Grtz, Dirk.

today a little telling about vortexes and poles.. if we start from a rotating disk then the heaviest material does not go to the outside but to the inside.. that is because it creates a virtual vortex in the middle of the disk.. and because we are talking about a rotating plain it is 2 vortexes, 1 up and 1 down.. - while the vortexes have been created then these act as exhaust's for the disk.. so all light material go up and down from the core.. that means water, steam, gas, radiation and electrons.. these elements create evaporation and cooling and so you get the cold poles.. - while the core gets bigger and heavier, the outside shell gets more lighter and electrified.. we could say a tight ++ core and an expanded -- plasma on the outside.. this answers the question why poles from planets do not align with poles from the sun.. this is because each body has its own disk/jet directions.. - this thinking can also be used for stars, galaxy's and what-ever-color holes.. Grtz, Dirk.

gravity is an overload of positive (+) particles.. there is no empty space or electrons in the core.. how larger the +++ core the larger its attraction field becomes.. it is like the workings of an atom, the heavier it gets the more the empty field and the more the electrons around.. because it is free to expand in space that is in fact a --- plasma.. - with gravity it is the same force but because it is imprisoned inside a mass it becomes an adverse force as it tries to attract the emptiness of space with the electrons.. therefor it expands its attraction field beyond the mass in space.. if the core would be released in space then the free atomic size of the earth would reach unto the moon.. - i think that magnetism is in the same category.. an overload of + or - creates an attraction field of the opposite.. for the earth it would be the negative (--) overload in the north direction front of solarsystem to future space.. while the south is an overload of positivity (++) direction back of the solarsystem towards the coldness of the past.. Grtz, Dirk.

as a digital nation we should have digital resources.. the best resource is our magazine ROOM.. now that we have ROOM with Asgardia we should take advantage of this combination.. we could make an Asgardian library with a section ROOM for example.. some articles (old news) for free and others by payment (interviews).. loose or in bundles.. make media library's or app's from high quality picture's.. in the meanwhile promote ROOM for subscriptions true Asgardia memberships/citizenship's.. take Carol under the arm and promote her to minister of library's.. Grtz, Dirk.

a thought that came from my previous post.. i found out in "Stellarium" that jupiter and saturn go near each other and go away from each other every 60 years.. so that makes a slingshot around the sun every 60 years viewed from the sun when the highlight is the alignment of the two.. that alone would create a big difference on the disk of the sun to start imbalances.. these imbalances would create sun-spots.. - on the other side we have the close planets that have a faster cycle and more alignments with themselves and close planets.. if we view from the sun to venus for example we can see many sub-alignments of the inner planets with the more outward planets.. all these variables should be accounted for if we start talking about solar cycles of sunspots.. the sunspots have no live or cycle on their own.. it comes from outside forces towards the sun.. and the same goes for nearby stars and other big forces in the nearby space.. Grtz, Dirk.

lets talk about a couple of forces that go with each other.. if we have a force that is of a certain amount then its impact to the outside is of the same amount regarding the first force.. lets take this to something practical.. if the earth has a certain degree of gravity then the magnetic force should mirror that degree of force true its magnetism.. so if we know the gravity and magnetism of earth we could use that as a measurement for other things in the solarsystem.. if we would use this standard on the solarsystem then the mass should mirror its magnetic shield.. - if we now look at the outside of the solar system then we see things coming in and going out.. some of these stay with us and are adding to the mass.. so the magnetic forces of impacted body's will rise according to this incoming masses.. and higher mass means then higher magnetism.. think of it as heavier disk versus stronger jets.. - we could also use this for the earth.. the more mass we put in space the less magnetism will be generated true the jets.. here we can also use the example of hot and cold.. the less heat true the disk the less cold true the jets or poles.. - for our sun it usually means the more impacts from outer space the more magnetic reactions.. here we have also the placements of the planets.. when the planets are traveling in groups around the sun or are traveling more dispersed around the sun.. this way they create less or more holes of income-ways for asteroids to the sun.. - from the tail of the magnetic field of the sun we have not much info.. but it should be a place where things leave our solar-system and therefore affect the main magnetic field of the sun.. also a possibility is that magnetism comes in to our solar-system from behind true the cold sources of the space around us.. - so to form another idea.. more impacts on earth for example is not a bad way for the future.. as it adds new mass and makes the magnetic field stronger.. the same goes for our solarsystem.. if we would look at it from a very big scale we should add more mass to our space-ship named the solar-system to augment its protective magnetic shield.. Grtz, Dirk.

what if we would setup our own digital space organization.. the org. could refer to everything to do with our space program.. from digital embassies to digital space-ports and space-arks.. we could run it like a sort of simulation towards the future.. we setup the framework and graphics and invite all things related to space on earth to visit us.. we could also run it a side the gov. and the nation, maybe somewhere in between as a new dimension to Asgardia.. we could build it also as an expanded business environment.. Grtz, Dirk.

if we would divide our digital work among the Asgardians then the route we would have to take is the route of numbers.. lets take 10000 digital workers that work 1 hour each week then that would sum up to 10k hours each week, 45k hours each month, 540k hours per year.. Grtz, Dirk.