Thank you for voting!

The universe i personally see is not one of a one time event, is see it as a recycling event. If we start with the smallest particles, the so called dark matter, we say that they are the largest mass of the universe, only we can not see them where they are. They come from black-hole jets and supernovae. From that point on they are free to get together with other particles they like to be connected to. From then they can go to a further stage which would be to connect to an atom where there are some seats free. From that point on they are in the mass-family. The atoms get together and build the materials we are seeing and feeling which are made by different degrees of pressure in the stellar objects. From that point they are a prey to the heavy black-holes with their massive gravity's. Ones they enter the territory of the black-holes or super-dence-cores they become part of the recycling path from where they originaly where born from and the cycle recommences...

With the recent new findings about black-holes and quantum physics i was thinking about a link between these two. If sub-atomic particles could have a link to each-other in different atoms that are at very large distances from each other, then they must have had a close relation to each other in the past. The first idea that came up to me was that if 2 of the same sort of particles where have to be born in the same place then they would continue this behavior as long as nothing interrupts this.

So lets say we have 100 different subatomic-particles in an atom and they all originated from black-holes. They would have been created under a very strong density and pressure and ones they where released from the black-holes, lets say in a super novae from 2 merging neutrons stars for example, then they would settle in atoms by for example supernovae-radiation. Ones these subatomic particles are freed they still would carry the entanglement they had in the black-holes where they ones where created.

So lets take a short-cut here, our local atoms in our local universe are build up of local supernovae subatomic-particles and are carrying the history or entanglement of close by black-hole explosions and/or jets.

Grtz, Dirk.

Today was a day of recycling computer stuff. I had 3 boxes in the end, 1 for metals that i had cleaned up as much as i could, 1 for hard plastic parts and 1 for print-plates with as much taken of as i could. These boxes will go to the recycling containerpark to be recycled. It is a nice feeling if you can do some little recycling work, feeeels gooood. Grtz, Dirk.

This one was a surprise to me. As we see here the sharks in their underwater-world we see the usual cyan color of the water. If we invert that, then that would take us to the colors that are absorbed. Interesting to see here is that the seawater is turning in red which means that the oceans are absorbing the IF-light of the suns spectrum, while the sharks them-selfs turn purple what means that they absorb the side of the UV-light from the sun. This could open some new perspectives how we see our oceans and the problems they've got.

Grtz, Dirk.

Another heat problem from above. Recently the Internet is overloaded with images of aurora's. Personally i am not happy with those pictures as they point us to the dangers of radiation from the sun. Our vision is based on reflection so if you invert the green then you can see the pink and purple  variants come true, that means that our atmosphere is absorbing all these sorts of UV radiation and thereby gets heated up. Some deflecting shields near the sun to have a larger shadow would be useful for earth. Anyone some space-monoliths?

Grtz, Dirk.

Every time that we lay some asphalt or concrete we eliminate the possibility to absorb UV like all green nature on earth. This radiation bounces back to the atmosphere and heats it. It is time that we build roads that absorb UV and in the mean time we could use solar techniques for this.

Grtz, Dirk.

Today i saw Olegnizhnik's blog posts, he is doing some sort of diary  what he is doing daily. I am going to adopt this and plant here some stuff  about computers what i do for hobby. This way maybe someone can learn  from it. Ok, today i cleaned up a box of cheap server stuff, mainly scsi harddisks but also a few ide's and sata's. I have here an older pc with windows 10 pro to do some testing and tryouts. I have quick formatted  some harddisk's that where in the box and also a few ones i had laying around wich i could not format with linux debian for one or other reason. Now they are all ready to format under debian and then they get a number and go in the rack for future use. That is somewhat the most important computer task of today. See you around for a next update 002. Grtz, Dirk.

Ok this one is a though one and will surely stir some brains around. We are questioning ourselfs where all dark matter is gone. I will give you a theory that could explain some questions. Here it goes. We are saying that all mass-body's in space are very hot inside, but what if we would assume that it is in fact the other way around. Then all cores would be colder then the outwards layers and the outer shell would be the hottest for the whole body. If cores are dense and stable then the electron layers on the outside would be the hottest thing because they move around and are emitting more energy. A neutron star would be very hot on the outside because of the massive amount of energy in the upper layer but the core (aka blackhole) would be colder then the outside. So if our perception of dark energy and dark matter is in fact the other way around then the inverted picture above would fit better for this theoreticly opposite view.

As a follow-up to my previous article here you can see the difference of perception with our biological view and an inverted logical view. In the first picture of the nebula we see clearly the material on the outside of the explosion as by the second picture the focus goes more to the clouds from the explosion with some material on the outside. Again this is a personal opinion.

Grtz, Dirk.

We are born on earth and are a biological life-form. Our eyes are a biological by-product from nature to see what is eatable and not, for example. What if we would build a new logical space-eye not based on our biological eye but on the most logical way to view space. In the images above i have inverted the colors and i will explain why i did this. We say that space is black and empty, but if we would take a logical approach to it we could say that space is in fact white because of all the light and energy traveling true it before it hits an object. This way of seeing things would also let us solve some mysteries we can not see and therefore we think they are not there. Just a personal idea.

Grtz, Dirk.

If we are planning to go mining in space then the obvious plan would go to the broken up planets. That is the only way to get the internal dense iron materials from inside a planet. The nearest by is the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Because this is a far voyage we should plan to do this in steps. The first step would be to build bases on the Moon, do some mining as test and make spaceships on the moon to blast of to Mars. Then build bases on Mars and do the same thing their on an expanded level to start mining in the asteroid belt wich is near Mars.

As long as there has been a knowledge of our night-sky there have been observations about this mysterious happening. Recent observations have put forward that the universe is continuous expanding. It is here that i want to start my personal view on this ever existing universe with my personal non scientific conclusions. As we know where ever there is a force there is also a contra-force. So the universe which is void and is continuous expanding must have somewhere a contra-force to keep this movement going beyond the big-bang theory. My personal view of this contra-force must be a shrinking contra-voiding force. That should be then the ever increasing density of mass in our observable universe true the ever growing giant galaxy's and their central black-holes or named in my own weird way super-density-cores where the elements of all mass are created.. but that is an other story. Thanks for reading and don't be afraid to think out of the box, then that is where progress begins.

Grtz, Dirk.

What is gravity? That was the question i asked myself today. Our atmosphere is gas, so everything that is denser then our atmosphere will fall to the ground. The more dense a material is, like iron, the more heavier it is and the lesser empty space it has around its particles. In our earth is an iron core, that inner core is very hot and very dense. There is no room for emptiness not even for electrons. So it must be a super positive energy where it is not allowed to have negative energy around. Because the void and electrons want to go to that center with all those lonely atoms, all material that is lighter then the material in the core are attracted to it because of the void and electrons that are missing in the core. We could say that the core is a super magnet for void and electrons. To put it even a step further all electricity is drawn to the center of the earth because it is in need of electrons for the atoms in the core. So my conclusion is that gravity is the pulling force for electrons to a heavy core.

Update with an additional theory part: if gravity is a pulling-force to the center of the earth then there should be a pushing-force that should be the cause. So my above theory is not so bad at all, if void and electrons are pushed away from the center then the same amount of contra-force could be described as our gravity. So to make a shortcut we could say that the amount of gravity should be related to the density of the center-core.

We need to take an example from Einstein and try to take shortcuts in the problems and solutions, until we reach a compact set of formula, or in other words a set of directives or commands till we reach the most best overall rules. If we can not do this by ourselfs then we should seek help with AI in law.