But it is not entirely clear:
"9. Asgardia does not engage in politics, there is no place for political parties in Asgardia".
Ie will not actually into-Asgardian parties or some other groups? Who then will discuss the problematic issues and the development model? Ministrys? The initiative groups without the formal registration? It seems that the issue is not thought out.
And with clause 12, I would not agree.
"12. There is no place for Earth history in Asgardia. Asgardia creates a new history of the future of the humankind".
Everyone has their own views, but I'm still an evolutionist, and the history of Asgardia, in theory, is just a continuation of history of the Earth, starting with the pre-biotic period (or inflection of Panov&Snooks curve). And generally, before to publish official documents, ought to make for a broad discussion of the projects, at least on the forum (and not after the fact).
Yes, "based on the birthright of Man in the universe" - too strong statement (by default, I all the same on the reverse - not the first and only). I would write at least "in the Solar system" (although also not completely fact - bodies with ice to the oceans can still be surprising, but in first approximation it seems to be true).