Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 12:07 UTC
Re: Discussion of the Declaration of Unity ¶
Maybe we need to extend this point: The religious extremism and the denial of the science are not allowed in Asgardia.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 12:07 UTC
Maybe we need to extend this point: The religious extremism and the denial of the science are not allowed in Asgardia.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 12:19 UTC
Maybe we need to extend this point: The religious extremism and the denial of the science are not allowed in Asgardia.
Now comes the rub.
Define your terms in a way that do not infringe on religious liberties or personal responsibility.
Religious Extremism
Denial of Science
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:00 UTC
Good start and like many already I'm slightly a bit confused/concerned about some of the wording but nothing too extreme. My thoughts follow on each of the Articles, but be advised I'm not a legal mind, just a regular man. I will add my interpretation in brackets for easier reading./
Article 1: Asgardia is a free and unified space state. (I personally would prefer it read : Asgardia is a space nation based on a Unified Humanity and Personal Freedoms.)
Article 2: the objectives of Asgardia are to:
• ensure peace in space (nothing worth changing here unless you want to include how this is to be achieved?)
• ensure the protection of planet Earth and the entire humankind from outer space
threats; (maybe to include Human based space threats and not limited to Aliens or asteroids etc)
• ensure equal opportunities in space for all Asgardians living on Earth, regardless
of geographic, financial, technological and other features of the countries of their earthly
citizenship./
Asgardia respects the laws of the states on Earth and the international agreements and wishes to be recognized as equal country among other states on Earth.
Asgardia does not interfere in the affairs of the states on Earth on the principle of reciprocity.
Asgardia takes part in events on Earth at an international level, like any other country, based on its membership in respective international organizations (nothing wrong with these ones)./ 8. Asgardia respects the rights of citizens of Earth states, and protects the rights of its own citizens when it comes to their exclusive rights as citizens of the Space State. (Will need clarification as rights in one state is different from another and with citizens having dual nationality we don't want to infringe on nation states citizens rights or impose ours on said states, i:e, to prevent criminal acts and judicial sentences being prevented by someone claiming dual nationality?)./
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:11 UTC
@HaddenB : Can you please add formatting to your post? It's really hard to read.
Also, here is the forum formatting guide: https://asgardia.space/en/forum/forum/welcome-127/topic/formatting-guide-56/
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:12 UTC
I feel that the objectives of Asgardia (point no. 2) should also include "for the furtherance of science and development of scientific temper within the human species.".
Also, point no. 12 is ambiguous and the implications need to be explained properly.
Other than these, I have no issue with the Declaration. Concise and succinct.
I apologise for any redundancy created by bringing forth my suggestions.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:19 UTC
@LoreZyra - it's not possible to post on that link anymore so I cant post there however, for everyone's info the editor responds pretty well to HTML coding as well.
That might make it easier for anyone who is interested
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:26 UTC
Thank you for the clarification and your thoughts Yovi... I completely agree... the document should be clear unambiguous.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:30 UTC
I apologise for any redundancy created by bringing forth my suggestions.
Instead of 'redundancy' think 'voting for the change to happen'. Really helps change how you can view your own input. Everyone has a voice, and should use it.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 13:35 UTC
Everyone has a voice, and should use it.
Absolutely! In order for a democratic nation to operate, its Citizens must be (self) compelled to speak up (or forever hold your peace).
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 14:39 UTC
David, I was referring to the possibility that the same points might have been made earlier, this making my suggestions a mere repetition.
P.S. : I like your work on the Constitution, and on the forum in general. I wish I could contribute to things myself too but there's time constraints.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 14:41 UTC
@Zyra, always been an advocate of free speech. My motivations for that particular line weren't meant to (wrongly) exhibit my lack of willingness to speak.
But I do hope the points put forth by the community, myself included, will be addressed aptly.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 16:56 UTC
Re@ Lorezyra Thanks for the remark, I tried that before but it never seemed to work, but its all sorted now thanks.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 19:31 UTC
I agree with the 12 points but I think it is necessary to specify a little more the economic issue since those who want to work and invest in the project asgardia still do not know well how the economy will work or what economic model will be managed. Additionally it is important to clarify where we will have a physical place on earth where we can address if the host country presents problems of security or public order.
Mar 29, 17 / Tau 04, 01 20:09 UTC
veo que hay demasiadas personas en desacuerdo con el punto 12, pero a mi parecer es importante desde el punto de vista filosófico puesto que nos pone a pensar en cual es el verdadero sentido del nacimiento de Asgardia. Mas que olvidar nuestra historia se trata de ser capaces de iniciar una nueva, una historia diferente, una historia alejada del fanatismo, una historia basada en la hermandad y la necesidad de sobrevivir y avanzar como especie, un nuevo comienzo para la raza humana. Olvidar nuestra historia es imposible, pero me pregunto; ¿de que sirve conservar una historia edificada sobre muerte, bañada en sangre y convertida en el arma mas poderosa usada por los padres de la naciones y las religiones para oprimir y sembrar el miedo en las personas para mantenerlas asustadas? ¿de que sirve honrrar una historia de miseria y dolor?. nunca debemos olvidar quienes fuimos y de donde venimos para no repetir la historia, pero si debemos ser capaces de visualizar un futuro diferente a la realidad de hoy día y eso no se alcanza enalteciendo la horrible historia que nos trajo hasta aquí.